Irregular Times: News Unfit to Print Logo

It is a time of fear in the face of freedom, a time of barricaded roads and new paths. Maps fade and direction is lost as we glance sideways at the strange lands through which we pass, knowing for certain only that our destination has disappeared. We are unready to meet these times but we proceed nonetheless, adapting as we wander, reshaping the Earth with every tread. Gone are the old times, the standard times, the high times. Welcome to the irregular times.

420 Days and Counting: Barack Obama Fails to Appoint Privacy and Civil Liberties
posted 16th March 2010 in Barack Obama, Homeland Insecurity, Legislation, Liberty, Politics by Jim

When a reauthorization of Patriot Act surveillance powers was sent to President Barack Obama’s desk, he signed it within two days, even though he was not required to do so by law.

President Obama is required under federal law to appoint a Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. It is the job of this board to set standards for training federal intelligence, investigation, and data mining officers in compliance with the civil liberties standards set out by the constitution. It is also the job of this board to review the behavior of government officers and report to Congress on violations of Americans’ constitutional rights that have occurred.

420 days into his administration, Barack Obama has failed to appoint a single member of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board. The board does not exist. Its activities are going undone.

How much longer will the President ignore the law? How much longer will the government ignore Americans’ rights?

Tags: , , , , , ,

4 Comments to “420 Days and Counting: Barack Obama Fails to Appoint Privacy and Civil Liberties”

  1. ChuckleNuts says:

    I give up. How long will it be?

  2. Tom says:

    It’s all about (corporate) health care “reform” (to give the insurance industry their “bailout”).

  3. prowlerzee says:

    Good catch, thanks!

  4. Anonymous says:

    he wants to take liberties not defend them… the constitution is under attack.

what are you thinking?