The Implications Of Odyssey Dawn

Only this morning, by the light of the slowly rising sun, did the terrible implication of the code name for America’s new war occur to me. The war is called Odyssey Dawn.

The Odyssey is the story of a warrior who was trapped for years in a military quagmire on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, and then took seven more years in his struggle to return home.

Why on earth would anyone choose a story of a man stuck for years in the consequences of a rush to battle as the code name of a new war?

About jclifford

A senior writer for Irregular Times. Formerly an antiaquarian speech pathologist.
This entry was posted in War and Peace and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Implications Of Odyssey Dawn

  1. Tom says:

    Yeah, it’s a lot like how “we” handled the whole Gulf of Mexico oil disaster (hint – it’s still leaking, but quick – look over there!):

    http://cryptogon.com/?p=21325

  2. Jim Cook says:

    The Odyssey is also the story of warriors who eat lotus flowers, forget their entire histories and fall into disaster as a result. That seems like it might be appropriate.

  3. qs says:

    TObama (2007): he President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.

    Q: In what circumstances would the president have constitutional authority to bomb Iran without seeking a use-of-force authorization from Congress?

    A: The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent. History has shown us time and again, however, that military action is most successful when it is authorized and supported by the Legislative branch. It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action. As for the specific question about bombing suspected nuclear sites, I recently introduced S.J.Res.23, which states in part that “any offensive military action taken by the United States against Iran must be explicitly authorized by Congress.”

    Source: Boston Globe questionnaire on Executive Power Dec 20, 2007

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>