Ron Paul Faced Down By Occupy The Caucuses

December 30th, 2011 | Posted by The Green Man in Activism | Election 2012 | Environment | Republicans

Ron Paul supporters insist that their great leader honors freedom of speech, but that’s not the face that the Ron Paul for President campaign showed yesterday. Yesterday, Ron Paul’s campaign called government officers to come and stop people from exercising their constitutional freedoms. Ron Paul’s campaign asked that people using their liberty have handcuffs slapped around their wrists before being hauled off to jail.

Demonstrators with Occupy The Caucuses showed up at the Ron Paul 2012 Iowa campaign headquarters. They protested Ron Paul’s opposition to environmental protections. Ron Paul wants to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency, and destroy laws the prevent massive pollution in American communities. “We need clean air and water, don’t dismantle the EPA,” said the protesters.

environmentalist protest against ron paul

Ron Paul’s campaign didn’t want to listen. Instead of honoring the voice of liberty, Ron Paul simply had the environmentalists placed behind bars.

Will voters in next week’s Iowa caucuses reward Ron Paul for his repression of political protest?

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

4 Responses

  • Tom says:

    Why are all the candidates so flawed?

  • Tom says:

    Yeah, all the Republicans and Obama have SERIOUS flaws that cannot be ignored or compromised about. Jill Stein i haven’t seen in action yet (except here) and Rocky Anderson is another rising star who will be examined between now and election day. i was talking about the Republican field in my comment.

    In other news, our government at work:
    http://cryptogon.com/?p=26712
    FDA Won’t Regulate Use of Antibiotics in Healthy Livestock Intended for Human Consumption
    Via: Guardian:

    “Environmental and consumer groups have condemned the US Food and Drug Administration’s move to renege on its long-held policy to regulate the use of human antibiotics in animal feed.

    Last week, the agency quietly announced it was withdrawing its plan to limit the use of antibiotics fed to healthy livestock intended for human consumption.

    Critics say the U-turn, which comes amid the FDA’s own stated concerns over food safety, is at odds with its obligations to protect the public.

    The groups also criticised the timing of the announcement, which was made during the holiday season and disclosed only in the federal register.

    The use of low doses of antibiotics in agricultural animal feed contributes to drug-resistant superbugs, according to food and health experts.

    One leading food policy writer described the policy reversal as “pathetic” and “dismaying.”

    “It’s dismaying, and obviously something they felt sheepish about, otherwise it wouldn’t have been released this week,” Michael Pollan, author of the Onmivore’s Dilemma and Food Rules: An Eater’s Manual, told the Guardian.

    “When Margaret Hamburg became the head of the FDA, she indicated this was a high priority for them and that she realised how much of a problem the profligate use of antibiotics was. She said she was going to treat this issue as if her hair was on fire. This isn’t the way someone acts when their hair is on fire.”

    Pollan said there was “no question” that meat could be produced without human antibiotics, as the EU has already banned them.

    The FDA first acknowledged in 1977 that the overuse of antibiotics in healthy livestock for growth promotion and disease prevention was unsafe and could promote antibiotic resistant bacteria that could infect people. An advisory committee at the time recommended that the FDA immediately withdraw approval for two drugs, penicillin and tetracycline, for subtherapeutic uses of the drugs in livestock.

    Last week, in a statement in the Federal Register, the FDA says it plans instead to allow the industry to self-regulate and “focus its efforts for now on the potential for voluntary reform and the promotion of the judicious use of antimicrobials in the interest of public health”.

    The problem, said Pollan, boils down to a lack of political will in the face of powerful industry interests. “There’s a lot of corporate money in politics these days,” he said. “Here you’re going up against not just one powerful industry, but two. This administration has had enough trouble going after individual powerful industries. That they would prevail against two of them joined together was too much to hope for.”

    Livestock consume about 80% of the antibiotics sold in the US.”

  • John Barrett says:

    Rocky anderson Justice party seems to be the only Politician ‘Ive found I can align myself with. Then again as a member of the 99% Rocky is in line with most of our major issues. Republicans have jumped on the millionaires cash payment to easy street with Obama and the Democrattic party as bad as the Republicans. Ron Paul is wierd and wants to let Americans do any thing they want to on their own land. I guess the keepin of wild animals Families who kidnap kids and keep them in their backyard will be much harder to catch. Try the Occupy Resistance movementor get on the Rocky anderson band wagon. I’m retired military bath regularly own my own home have retired twice and lost huge amounts of money because of the Bush dynasty. Guess I don’t fit the Druggie limpbaughs thoughts on Occupy. The Republicans align well with drugies multiple marriges as a eesult of infidelity. I’ll stay with Rocky.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>