The journey that took the Curiosity rover from the surface of the Earth to Mars was a remarkable achievement. However, a much more important achievement from NASA took place this week, though it didn’t include parachutes, roaring rockets, and heat shields (if only it had included heat shields). This week, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences released the results of a statistical analysis of summer temperatures over time, from the 1950s to today. These statistics provide “a high degree of confidence” that the extremely hot temperatures of this summer would not have occurred if the long-term trend of global warming was not present, says the study’s author, Dr. James Hansen.
Many politicians in Washington D.C., however, are refusing to accept the validity of this statistical evidence. It isn’t that they have an alternative statistical model that disproves Hansen’s analysis. They simply can’t bring their minds to accept the reality of global warming, because it subjectively feels like an outrageous idea to them. It’s like a member of Congress refusing to believe that NASA really was able to land the Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars, because the technical achievement seems too intricate to have been accomplished.
Senator James Inhofe, who calls the global warming the “greatest hoax” of all times, is one of the dwindling number of members of Congress who still insists that global warming isn’t happening. “Look at the patterns. It gets cold, it gets warmer, it gets colder, gets warmer,” he says.
Actually, NASA did look at the patterns. That’s what the Hansen study was all about. But, if Senator Inhofe isn’t capable of understanding the statistical analysis underlying that study, maybe a visual representation of the data could help convince him, just as photographs of the Martian surface from the Curiosity rover might convince people who doubt the reality of the new Mars rover mission.
NASA has provided two forms of visualizing the temperature data examined by Dr. Hansen. The first, below, is a map of the Northern hemisphere, showing extreme temperature events during the summer, year by year. You’ll find a more complete video of this data, moving from the 1950s up to last summer at the NASA web site, but as you can see just from these three years selected in the image below, the summers we’re having now have many more extreme heat events than used to take place. Extreme heat, beyond two standard deviations above the 1950s norm, was found over just one percent of the surface of the Earth in the Northern Hemisphere’s summertime back in the 1950s, but is found over 10 percent of the Northern Hemisphere in summer today.

The second visualization of the summer temperature data scrutinized in the Hansen study, also available on video, shows the shift over the last seven decades of summertime temperature extremes strikingly out of the predictable bell curve of 1950s temperatures, becoming much hotter over time.

These visual models, as well as the statistical data that they’re based upon, show that Senator James Inhofe is clearly wrong. We looked at the patterns, and there has not been a cycle of warming and cooling between the 1950s and today. There has been a trend in one direction: The planet has been getting hotter. Most worrisome is that the heating trend appears to be accelerating.
The science of anthropogenic global warming has been clear for many years now, and this new study simply expands that body of scientific understanding, showing the highly probable link between the extreme weather events we’re seeing this year and the larger trend of global warming. Cold Earthers like James Inhofe like to protest that no single extreme weather event can with absolute knowledge be linked to a larger global warming trend, and that’s true, but it’s also not the point.
The massive problem of drought, wildfires, deadly heat waves and resulting crop failures this year would be an isolated tragedy, if it weren’t for the fact that these problems have been coming with increasing frequency over the last few generations. The important story isn’t a single wildfire or area of parched earth. The important story is that what used to be extreme heat and drought are becoming a regular part of our new climate.


You know what these charts illustrate? They show how we’ve failed the planet over the decades since the Industrial Revolution. We as a species have been barrelling down the wrong road at top speed for the last few hundred years, running over other species (road kill), slopping oil all over the place and fouling the air all along the way. Now, of course, we’re “dismayed” at the fact that this road runs us right off a cliff we didn’t see coming, that we’ve become fat, lazy slobs with no concern for life, and that the future, if there even is one at this point, looks mind-bogglingly bleak.
“We may’s well enjoy the rest a the ride.” is what we’re hearing from the likes of Inhofe et al. There’s little to no chance that we’re gonna change anything in time to do any good. We still use coal to fire our electrical powerplants, with all the pollution it spews into the air and water. We’re fracking our asses off here in PA, NY and Ohio – ruining the only fresh water supply we have. The nuke plants still have the same problems they had 10 years ago (where do we put the “spent” fuel rods that stay radioactive for longer than we’ll be around?) but we’re still lookin’ into building more. Farming has only gotten MORE dependent on fossil fuels, and run-off is still creating dead zones.
Let’s face it – we’re killing ourselves and we don’t care. If we actually cared, we’d be doing things differently and wouldn’t put up with the on-going rape of the environment.
http://guymcpherson.com/2012/08/whats-important/
I’m not ordinarily a ‘hater’, but I’m beginning to think that it’s time to start branding the James Inhofes of the world…climate deniers who are entrusted with positions from which they could actually do something to attempt to respond to the global warming threat…with the title they so richly deserve: enemies of civilization. I think this should be repeated tirelessly. Unlike captains of industry, whose only concern is lining their pockets and who revel in relative invisibility, politicians like Inhofe, who are necessarily megalomaniacs, tend to care a lot about their places in history. And history will record that these shills willfully turned their backs on their own species for a handful of silver, obstructing at every turn mankind’s efforts to do something about this self-imposed threat.
No, runaway global warming won’t kill us all (I don’t think), but it will disrupt civilization in ways we can today barely contemplate. It will degrade the quality of human life for many generations to come, and undo many of mankind’s hard-won advances. The genius of our species is our ability to learn from mistakes, and respond accordingly. Inhofe would have it otherwise: don’t learn, just deny, deny, deny, and the consequences be damned, even as his own state of Oklahoma begins to show the first signs of becoming uninhabitable. This is not merely inhuman…it is sub-human.
Hot enough for you? Blame a troglodyte climate-denying Republican. Blame ‘em at every opportunity. Shame them back into the holes they crawled out of.
Actually Bill, we’re on our way to extinction:
http://guymcpherson.com/2012/06/were-done/