Author Archives: jclifford

About jclifford

A senior writer for Irregular Times. Formerly an antiaquarian speech pathologist.

Earlier today, Jim wrote about the newly-introduced H.R. 2399, legislation that would somewhat restrict, but not end, massive wiretapping of Americans’ electronic communications by the U.S. military through the National Security Agency.

Another piece of legislation with the same goal, though perhaps not the same mechanisms, was introduced yesterday in the U.S. Senate. The bill is S. 1182, “A bill to modify the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to require specific evidence for access to business records and other tangible things, and provide appropriate transition procedures”.

senate privacy billThe text of the legislation is not yet available from the Government Printing Office, but bill’s author, Senator Mark Udall, said in a floor speech yesterday that it is “designed to narrow Section 215 of the USA PATRIOT Act, known also as the “business records” provision, to better balance the authorities we give the federal government while protecting our constitutional rights. More specifically, my legislation would prevent the federal government from collecting millions of law-abiding Americans’ phone call records without first establishing some nexus to terrorism. We all expect the NSA to target terrorists, but the revelations in the past few weeks have made clear that the information of millions of law-abiding Americans is being swept up in the process… While this legislation would still allow law enforcement and intelligence agencies to use the PATRIOT Act to obtain a wide range of records in the course of terrorism and espionage-related investigations, it would require them to demonstrate that the records are in some way connected to terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities – which is not the case today.”

As you can see, the bill’s cosponsorship is bipartisan, though most of the cosponsors are Democrats.

The Democrats Who Support S. 1182:

Mark Begich
Jeff Merkley
Mark Udall
Tom Udall
Ron Wyden

The Republicans Who Support S. 1182:

Mike Lee
Lisa Murkowski

Today, President Barack Obama is giving us a new reason that we should all just forget about his use of George W. Bush’s Homeland Security electronic dragnet to take our private communications and make them available to be read at will by military spies.

“It is transparent,”Obama says of his military spy network targeting tens of millions of Americans. “That’s why we set up the FISA court.”

File this story in the folder entitled How Stupid Does He Think We Are?

obama nsa transparencyThe Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, what Obama refers to as the FISA court, is not transparent. It’s a court that acts in secret. Its judges aren’t identified. Its location is not identified. The cases that are brought before the it are secret. Its process is secret. Even the legal theories the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court are kept secret from the American people.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has been kept so secret that, until this month, the American people didn’t have any concrete evidence that the court was rubber stamping a military surveillance system so huge that it has been spying on practically every human being within the borders of the USA for at least six years. The Obama Administration had been telling everyone that the court was only approving spying against foreigners outside the United States. We were being lied to, but we had no way of knowing it.

That’s not what transparency looks like.

The FISA court is the opposite of transparent.

Barack Obama’s excuses for his massive violation of Americans’ constitutional rights are transparently dishonest.

So Barack Obama ordered practically every cell phone in the United States to be traced. So what?

So the Obama Administration continued without reform the Orwellian programs from the days of George W. Bush that Obama promised to fix. What’s the big deal?

So the Democratic Party is now celebrating the sacrifice of freedom for the sake of a little security. Who cares, so long as we’re safe?

That’s been the attitude of the Stephanie Miller radio show for the last two weeks. With every new revelation that the Big Brother electronic spying against Americans was even bigger, and even worse, than what Barack Obama had admitted to, Stephanie Miller has released a sigh of exasperation, and blasted liberals for daring to criticize Barack Obama’s right wing position in favor of totalitarian surveillance of American citizens.

This stance may be surprising to some. Hasn’t Stephanie Miller positioned herself as a “progressive” and a “liberal”?

Yes, she did… for as long as that was a convenient advertising demographic.

You see, Stephanie Miller knows that if she can’t keep her advertisers, she can’t keep her radio show. Without her radio show, Stephanie Miller won’t have a job, and Stephanie Miller isn’t the sort to sacrifice her comfort and position for a matter of principle. She’s in the entertainment business, and she will say whatever it takes to keep the advertisers paying the bills.

stephanie miller shill

Oh dear, what advertisers Stephanie Miller has chosen to align herself with.

The two primary advertisers on the Stephanie Miller radio show are: Carbonite, a company that promises its customers private, secure storage of their data online; and Go To My PC, a company that promises its customers that they can access the data and programs on their computers securely and privately.

Would it do for Stephanie Miller to acknowledge to her listeners that the private information they store on Carbonite’s systems does not remain private? Would it be profitable for Stephanie Miller to admit to her listeners that, whenever they use a system like Go To My PC, their personal documents become available to be read by spies?

Could Stephanie Miller report honestly on these stories, and then turn around and give a little commercial endorsement for Carbonite and Go To My PC? Oh, no. That would be bad for business.

So, Stephanie Miller tells her radio audience that the NSA online surveillance scandal is nothing to worry about. Just relax, she says, and go pay your monthly fees to my advertisers.

There’s a word we have for people who will promote whatever political message they are paid to promote, regardless of its accuracy. We call them shills.

Stephanie Miller is a Grade A shill.

The Fourth Amendment is exceptionally clear. It reads: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

In order to seize “papers” – that is, people’s private information – the government is required by the highest law in the land to target particularly named people, searching only particular places, and naming before search and seizure takes place the things that will be seized.

There’s no exemption to this for security, or for the sake of criminal investigations. Nowhere in the Constitution is there a provision that the Fourth Amendment can be ignored if the Executive Branch claims (using supposedly secret information) that ignoring the Fourth Amendment helps stop criminal conspiracy. The whole point of the Fourth Amendment, and much of the rest of the Bill of Rights, is that, in order to protect the liberty of the American people, the Executive Branch must be strongly limited in its security and police powers.

nsa spying must stopHowever, we’ve learned this month that the National Security Agency, which is not even a domestic law enforcement agency, but a part of the U.S. military, has been engaging in massive violations of the Fourth Amendment rights of tens of millions, and perhaps hundreds of millions, of Americans every day. They’ve been seizing private phone records, spying on who talks to who. They’ve been seizing private social media data. They’ve been grabbing private emails, and information about who visits what web sites, when, and what for.

The U.S. military, through its PRISM and telephone surveillance program, has been spying on practically the entire population of the United States of America.

Still, Democrats in the media like Stephanie Miller have been rushing to the defense of Barack Obama. It doesn’t matter that Obama continued George W. Bush’s programs to violate the Constitution, they’re saying now. All that matters is that Americans are safe.

Besides, they’ve argued, spying on millions of people’s private activities doesn’t matter so long as the spying is only on people’s metadata. Sure, the government is watching who talks to who, and watches where they go, and what they buy, but what matters is that Americans feel secure, knowing that Big Brother is watching.

Can you believe it, that the Democratic Party has sunk so low that they’re now clapping loudly for the values of Big Brother and Homeland Security? They’ll approve of anything, it seems, just so long as it’s a Democrat who’s doing it.

Today, in the aftermath of the mental fog of a relaxing father’s day weekend, we’re learning that NO, THE NSA WAS NOT JUST SPYING ON OUR METADATA. U.S. military spies have been listening in on the content of our telephone calls as well – at will.

What’s more, Edward Snowden has revealed that the Obama Administration has been circumventing even the rubber stamp of the Judiciary Branch’s Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, and has been allowing low-level analysts to listen to phone calls and read emails without any search warrant being issued to do so. Electronic privacy experts are backing up his description of what’s been going on, pointing out that data from companies like Google, Facebook and Apple has been grabbed at “listening posts”, regardless of the limitations that those companies, now desperate to stop the stampede of customers leaving their systems, have described.

There are no judges issuing warrants for these searches – just the spies themselves, approving their own surveillance operations against Americans.

Every excuse that the Democratic Party establishment has offered for this Orwellian Obama surveillance against Americans has turned out to be a sham.

I’m saying this as a liberal: No person who sincerely believes in the integrity of the Bill of Rights can stay with the thoroughly corrupt Democratic Party. Oh, yes, the Republican Party is thoroughly corrupt as well, but this isn’t a partisan issue any more. The stain of authoritarianism is heavy upon both the Democrats and the Republicans, and it is time for politicians and voters of conscience to walk away from both. They deserve nothing but our firm opposition.

Dangerous EarthGro Pottting Soil From Scotts

June 17th, 2013 | Posted by jclifford in Gardening - (1 Comments)

I am in the process of creating a new vegetable garden this summer, on a piece of land that gets good sun, but where the soil is poor.  Generations ago, people had created a driveway for horse-drawn carriages to the barn next to this area, building up the path with a jumble of bone, stone, and pottery shreds.  To grow vegetables there, I’ll have to build new soil up.

My plan has been to start with a foot-thick pages of mulch, to suppress the grass presently growing in the area, and to provide a good amount of organic material from which future years of vegetables will grow. To grow a relatively small number of plants in the garden this year, and to encourage the soil biology of the new garden to move along, decomposing the mulch, I’ve been placing pockets of soil within the mulch.

I have some compost for this project, but not enough for the size of the new garden. So, I decided to get a few bags of soil from the store to increase the volume.

Most of the soil that’s available in the garden centers is filled with MiracleGro, a synthetic fertilizer that encourages plants to grow lush, and full, and beautifully, but a bit too fast, leaving them. I don’t want to use that, so I took a few bags of what looked like a smaller company’s soil – EarthGro potting soil. It said it was “organic” and “natural”.

Do shards of glass and ceramic sherds count as organic and natural? That’s what I found in the Earthgro potting soil.

It’s just the sort of material that was thrown in to the ground by the people who lived in my house years ago. It takes up space quickly, but won’t help a garden grow well – or keep a gardener’s hands safe.

Upon further investigation, I find out that Earthgro potting soil is manufactured by the Scotts Company, the same people who make Miracle-Gro. To them, I suggest placing a warning label prominently on the Earthgro packaging: May Contain Dangerous Fragments Of Industrial Refuse.

Gmail sure is convenient. I know. I’ve used it for many years. Google brings so many services together through its account, it’s easy to slide into doing practically everything on Google’s systems: Not just writing emails, but setting up family and professional calendars, writing manuscripts, calculating home budgets and taxes, uploading photographs, sharing videos, reading the news, buying stuff, searching for information…

Pretty soon, Google gets into every part of your life, and it all seems to have no cost.

That’s an illusion. The cost of using Google services is actually quite high.

Every supposedly free service that Google offers includes software that tracks your activity, and saves a record of what you’ve done in Google’s databases, where Google employees can read through it at will. Your emails are read by others’ eyes. People you don’t know watch your supposedly private videos. Documents you wanted to be confidential are available for people at Google to read – and to use for commercial purposes.

It doesn’t matter if you delete the things you’ve uploaded to Google’s systems. Google keeps them anyway.

smartmailThe hidden cost of Google’s services doesn’t end there. Once Google has your private papers, pictures, and videos, military spies have them too. The PRISM military Internet spying program is sucking huge amounts of Google user data out of Google’s servers on a daily basis, so that spies over at the Pentagon can sift through Americans’ private communications, or send them over to domestic agents for perusal.

Not so long ago, we warned about some of the dangers of Google’s data mining systems, and recommended some alternatives. Among those alternatives was Startpage.com, a search engine that uses Google, but sets up a screen between users and the Google search system, preventing Google search from logging users’ IP addresses for the purposes of data mining.

StartPage is now positioning itself against Google as the secure search alternative. They write, “StartPage and its sister search engine Ixquick have in their 14-year history never provided a single byte of user data to the US government, or any other government or agency. Not under PRISM, nor under any other program in the US, nor under any program anywhere in the world. We are not like Yahoo, Facebook, Google, Apple, Skype, or the other US companies who got caught up in the web of PRISM surveillance.”

Ah, but couldn’t the Obama Administration simply serve StartPage with one of the National Security Letters created under the Patriot Act? No, because StartPage isn’t based in the United States. “Our company is based in The Netherlands, Europe. US jurisdiction does not apply to us, at least not directly. Any request or demand from ANY government (including the US) to deliver user data, will be thoroughly checked by our lawyers, and we will not comply unless the law which actually applies to us would undeniably require it from us. And even in that hypothetical situation, we refer to our first point; we don’t even have any user data to give. We will never cooperate with voluntary spying programs like PRISM,” StartPage explains.

Now, IxQuick, the people behind StartPage, are preparing StartMail, an email system that will offer user privacy as well – of a sort.

The StartMail system, which will soon enter Beta testing, will not engage in data mining of the sort that has become pervasive in Gmail. The emails will be encrypted using (“PGP encryption”)… and it all sounds great… until one realizes that the federal spy agencies have the expertise to overcome any kind of encryption system that is used in commercial systems.

In the abstract, StartMail seems like a timely idea. In practice, I’m skeptical that NSA cyberspies can be kept out of any email system.

Techies, I’m asking for your help in understanding these issues. Could StartMail actually be made sustainably secure from the government’s online spies? Is StartPage really only secure for now because it’s too small at the moment to catch the attention of Big Brother?

Okay, James Clapper did not really testify that jillions of terrorist attacks were stopped by the military’s PRISM and telephone electronic surveillance dragnets targeted against Americans, but he might as well have.

nsa spyingClapper, the director of the military’s National Security Agency, told members of the U.S. Senate that his organization’s electronic surveillance dragnet had stopped “dozens” of attacks against the USA by nasty terrorists bent on bloody murder. The truth, however, is rather less dramatic.

Actually, the Obama Administration has only identified two cases in which the NSA’s unconstitutional spying is supposed to have contributed to thwarting terrorist attacks. What’s more, in those two cases, the NSA surveillance system played only a backup role. It was conventional, legal, constitutional intelligence methods that identified and blocked those attempted terrorist attacks. The NSA spying wasn’t necessary in these cases.

James Clapper knows that, as long as his electronic spying system is classified, he can make whatever claims of success he likes. Who’s going to try to verify his claims, after all? No one is conducting real oversight. The justifications for the massive daily violation of Americans’ constitutional rights are themselves top secret.

Of course, we don’t have to believe Clapper. We have no reason to. From what we know, it seems clear that James Clapper and his military friends have trashed the U.S. Constitution and given us, in return, an ineffectual security tool.

Support An Obama Vs. Snowden Public Debate!

June 12th, 2013 | Posted by jclifford in Activism | Barack Obama | Video - (0 Comments)

Yesterday, I wrote of a petition in the official White House system that demands the resignation of Barack Obama over his continuation and expansion of a massive military electronic surveillance dragnet that is targeted against the American people. There are now over 20,000 signatures on that petition. When the number of signatures reaches 100,000, Barack Obama will be forced to officially respond to the demand for his resignation from office.

obama debate edward snowdenAn even more delicious petition in the White House system has come to my attention in the meantime. This petition demands that Barack Obama engage in a public, one-hour debate with Edward Snowden, the man who heroically exposed the unconstitutional Big Brother spying program, and who is now on the run from the feds.

The petition reads, “President Obama, you have said that the NSA’s blanket tracking of Americans’ phone calls and collaboration with tech giants “struck the right balance” and that you “welcome this debate”. You must agree that this issue is worthy of your time, and as our president you are the best qualified person to make the case in favor of broad surveillance. To make the opposing case, we can think of no one better than whistleblower Edward Snowden. Like you, he has access to the data showing the tradeoff between securing America and damaging democracy (which at this point the public does not). He speaks with breathtaking clarity, and has left behind a comfortable life, facing death for the strength of his convictions. If you are as strong in yours, you owe him (and us) 1 hour of your time for this.”

Until Barack Obama can summon the courage to face Edward Snowden, here’s another debate: This one is the debate over extreme government surveillance programs between Barack Obama the presidential candidate and Barack Obama the President.

(Warning: If your stomach is sensitive to extreme hypocrisy in the morning, you might not want to play this video)