So Barack Obama ordered practically every cell phone in the United States to be traced. So what?

So the Obama Administration continued without reform the Orwellian programs from the days of George W. Bush that Obama promised to fix. What’s the big deal?

So the Democratic Party is now celebrating the sacrifice of freedom for the sake of a little security. Who cares, so long as we’re safe?

That’s been the attitude of the Stephanie Miller radio show for the last two weeks. With every new revelation that the Big Brother electronic spying against Americans was even bigger, and even worse, than what Barack Obama had admitted to, Stephanie Miller has released a sigh of exasperation, and blasted liberals for daring to criticize Barack Obama’s right wing position in favor of totalitarian surveillance of American citizens.

This stance may be surprising to some. Hasn’t Stephanie Miller positioned herself as a “progressive” and a “liberal”?

Yes, she did… for as long as that was a convenient advertising demographic.

You see, Stephanie Miller knows that if she can’t keep her advertisers, she can’t keep her radio show. Without her radio show, Stephanie Miller won’t have a job, and Stephanie Miller isn’t the sort to sacrifice her comfort and position for a matter of principle. She’s in the entertainment business, and she will say whatever it takes to keep the advertisers paying the bills.

stephanie miller shill

Oh dear, what advertisers Stephanie Miller has chosen to align herself with.

The two primary advertisers on the Stephanie Miller radio show are: Carbonite, a company that promises its customers private, secure storage of their data online; and Go To My PC, a company that promises its customers that they can access the data and programs on their computers securely and privately.

Would it do for Stephanie Miller to acknowledge to her listeners that the private information they store on Carbonite’s systems does not remain private? Would it be profitable for Stephanie Miller to admit to her listeners that, whenever they use a system like Go To My PC, their personal documents become available to be read by spies?

Could Stephanie Miller report honestly on these stories, and then turn around and give a little commercial endorsement for Carbonite and Go To My PC? Oh, no. That would be bad for business.

So, Stephanie Miller tells her radio audience that the NSA online surveillance scandal is nothing to worry about. Just relax, she says, and go pay your monthly fees to my advertisers.

There’s a word we have for people who will promote whatever political message they are paid to promote, regardless of its accuracy. We call them shills.

Stephanie Miller is a Grade A shill.

Today, I got an email about an “exclusive invitation” “to grow your presence on Twitter.” Exclusive sounds special, so I took a look at the email to see what it had to offer.

exclusive twitter offerThe email offered me the opportunity to advertise on Twitter.

Is this an exclusive offer? When I go to Twitter.com, there’s a prominent link on the front page, for “Advertisers”, which leads to a page that invites people to “Start Advertising”.

It seems that the offer to pay Twitter to advertise on its site is exclusive to people who

1. Have access to a computer
2. Can read

or

3. Know someone who has access to a computer and can read

Thanks for making me feel special, Twitter. What’s next… an exclusive offer to receive a telephone call from Twitter’s advertising sales division?

In the British Journal of Psychiatry, Heyman et al (2001) find a trend of rising numbers of cases of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) as people age out of childhood and into their early adult lives. What can explain this age trend? OCD Education Station writes about another trend related to time — a surge in OCD diagnoses over the past few decades:

Some people wonder how OCD could grow from a little-known condition just a few decades ago to one widely recognized today. They ask if OCD is some new form of disorder brought about by the way our society is changing, or if parents are doing something differently today that has caused a spike in the prevalence of this disorder.

A few facts that might tie this all together:

  1. Before the 1970s, OCD was considered rare.
  2. In 1976, Raffi’s album Singable Songs for the Very Young was released.
  3. Subsequent releases of the same album were made in 1990, 1996, 2008 and 2010.
  4. The album stormed the Billboard Top Kid Audio Charts in 1999 and 2013.
  5. The lyrics of one song on the album, “You Brush Your Teeth!,” suggest that children brush their teeth habitually, on the hour, in the middle of the night. When? When you think you hear a knock on the door. When you want to have a little fun. When you want to find something to do. When you just can’t wait to come alive. When your mind starts humming — “Twiddle dee dee, twiddle dee dee.”
  6. All the while… OCD diagnoses rise.

Something to think about.

Others say the rise in diagnosis has something to do with “awareness,” “education,” and “support” for those who were previously suffering in the dark. Raffi or community? You decide — but if you belong to the OCD tribe, consider a walk along the path of the OCD tribe.

It’s not about what you ate for breakfast: at its best, Twitter is a democratic news feed of sorts, serving up 140-character headlines written by whoever wants to write them, linking to longer, more informative articles written by journalists or citizens. Twitter feeds can subvert the story line supplied by the corporate-dominated news media. Last week, I wrote a pair of articles about H.R. 1406, a bill passed by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives that would end overtime pay and instead allow corporate employers to push workers into longer hours at odder intervals for less pay. What are others saying about this bill (which now sits in the thankfully slow Senate)? The directs me to these articles:

From the Machinists News Network:

Proposed Bill Would End 40-Hour Work Week

Sponsored by Rep. Martha Roby (AL), the dubiously-titled “Working Families Flexibility Act” (H.R. 1406) would remove the requirement that employers pay a cash premium for overtime work and instead allow them to offer employees compensatory time off. The effect would be an FLSA that is undermined of its only incentive against excessive hours and a cheaper way for employers to demand mandatory overtime.

Eileen Appelbaum, a senior economist with the Center for Economic Policy and Research, says the bill’s major effect would be to hurt workers, “likely increasing overtime hours for those who don’t want them and cutting pay for those who do.”

A video produced by Democratic staff on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce

Patrick Corp’s Op-Ed in the Roanoke Times:

Scenario: Boss Bob comes to Mary and says, “I need you to work Sunday. Jane has to take her mom to the nursing home, but corporate has a no overtime rule right now, so it will have to be for comp time, that OK with you Mary?” How often do you really think Mary is going to say “no”?

So Mary keeps getting “asked” to work Sundays throughout the summer and into the holiday shopping season, for comp time of course. Mary, one day, says to Boss Bob, “I would like next Friday off for little Jimmy’s school play. I’ll use eight hours of comp time.”

Ah, but Boss Bob needs Mary because Jane finally quit, and there is a hiring freeze by corporate. He has an out. The law says an employee who has requested the use of such compensatory time shall be permitted by the employee’s employer (Boss Bob) to use such time within a reasonable period after making the request if the use of the compensatory time does not unduly disrupt the operations of the employer.

Boss Bob states they are swamped, and Mary has to work.

U.S. UnCut Virginia:

H.R. 1406 basically allows employers to roll time worked over 40 hours into “compensation time” instead of overtime it is a true end to the 40 hour work week.

Under Current law , hourly employees are paid 1 1/2 times the rate for hours worked more than 40 hours However, with H.R. 1406 , Employers can take all of those wages earned above 40 hours and put into a pot for future time off AT EMPLOYERS discretion.

In order to take a day off employees have to hope their employer allows them to work over , This takes away the incentive for employers to offer actual sick leave, It’s also possible Employers will cease hiring new employees when they can simply run a few ragged for 60 or 70 hours without having to pay them more than their base pay, this also amounts to a no-interest loan to employers from workers.

Dave Johnson for TruthOut:

The House will be voting on H.R. 1406, The Working Families Flexibility Act, which lets employers offer “comp time” instead of overtime pay. The problem is that employers will pressure workers to take comp time instead of overtime, which reduces paychecks and gets rid of the incentive to hire more people. Later, the employees will be pressured to not take that comp time, or will have to be “on call,” etcetera.

It is important to note that the law does not guarantee workers the right to actually use the comp time they get instead of extra pay. Employers can put it off forever. You can’t use this time when you want to, only when the employer decides it is okay.

Leo Gerard for the Campaign for America’s Future:

A century ago, workers were a lot more “flexible” than they are now. Veritable Gumbies in the mills and mines and factories they were, distorting their lives to slog 10 or 12 hours a day, six – even seven – days a week.

Then came the 40-hour week. And weekends. And eventually sick days. And paid vacation days. Now, bosses at mills and mines and factories regard these rules as coddling and consider the workers accustomed to them as unyielding to corporate demands.

The GOP has an app for that. It’s called the Working Families Flexibility Act. This legislation that the Republican majority in the U.S. House is expected to pass this week would force some old-time flexibility into 21st century workers. The forced flexibility act would award bosses the power to “offer” compensatory time off instead of overtime pay. Bosses, not workers, would determine when the comp time could be taken. The proposal puts control in corporate hands, obliging wage earners to bend over backward for bosses exactly like their Gumby ancestors were compelled to.

Trade unionists and labor rights activists died to achieve the goal of eight-hour days and 40-hour weeks. They were shot and beaten in the streets during demonstrations organized by the eight-hour movement. Their slogan was: “Eight hours for work; eight hours for rest; eight hours for what we will.”

Today, political writers across America are freaking out about the news that the Obama Administration conducted surveillance of Fox news reporter James Rosen, upon suspicion that Rosen was involved in a criminal leak of classified information.  Over at Salon, Natasha Lennard breathlessly wrote that, “In the case of Fox News’ chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, the DOJ not only tracked his phone records, but obtained a warrant to view his personal emails and even obtained “security badge access records to track the reporter’s comings and goings from the State Department.”

These allegations sound serious, and so, we should deal with them in a serious manner – without groundless speculation and hyperbole.  Let’s look at Lennard’s claims one by one.

1.  The Obama Administration seized James Rosen’s phone records.

If this allegation is true, it’s one more example of a grave problem: The Obama Administration has followed George W. Bush’s practice of seizing private telephone information, without search warrants, of huge numbers of Americans, journalists and non-journalists.  We’ve criticized the seizure of phone records from the Associated Press, but in the larger scale, we’ve been long-term critics of the FISA Amendments Act.  The FISA Amendments Act has been used for years by both Bush and Obama to unconstitutionally grab Americans’ private telephone and Internet communications without notification and without search warrant.  James Rosen’s organization, Fox News, has been an enthusiastic supporter of this surveillance.  It seems hypocritical of Fox News to complain now simply because it’s learned that one of its own reporters has been targeted.

2.  The Department of Justice “obtained a warrant to view his personal emails”, which is exactly how things are supposed to work.  The Fourth Amendment doesn’t prohibit government search and seizure.  It prohibits unreasonable search and seizure without a search warrant.  In the case of James Rosen’s emails, a search warrant was obtained, and the search was conducted in response to evidence that James Rosen was involved in a serious crime.  So, what’s the problem?

3.  The Department of Justice obtained access to State Department logs of when James Rosen checked in at the State Department, using a security badge he had been granted with the explicit understanding that if he wanted to use the badge to gain access to State Department officials, he would let the government know that he was doing so.

This is the most idiotically hyped up element of the James Rosen surveillance scandal.  Here we have a reporter who is complaining that the Obama Administration gained access to information that the reporter voluntarily gave to the Obama Administration.  It’s not private activity when a person uses a government-issued security badge to go to federal government offices.  It’s information that belongs to the federal government, to be used to maintain security, which is exactly what was being done when the Obama Administration accessed Rosen’s security badge information to investigate the illegal spread of classified information.

If you don’t like the securty badge policy, okay.  Agitate to eliminate the use of security badges for journalists as an unconstitutional violation of the Freedom of the Press.  James Rosen wasn’t doing that.  He agreed to submit to the process without protest.  Now he’s peeved that the process he approved of was put into action.

In general, political journalists in Washington D.C. are coming off looking as short-sighted and self-serving as Fox News and James Rosen.  Almost none of them wrote in protest against laws like the Patriot Act and FISA Amendments Act, because those laws didn’t appear to be specifically targeted against journalists.  Even now, American journalism is focusing on abuse of reporters’ privacy exclusively, continuing to ignore the growth of a larger Homeland Security juggernaut.  Journalism’s attitude seems to be that it deserves special protections, while other Americans cannot reasonably expect to keep their ordinary, fundamental constitutional rights.

Reporters, if you’re angry about Barack Obama’s continuation of George W. Bush’s seizure of unconstitutional powers of search and seizure, you should take that outrage, and use it to defend the Fourth Amendment rights of ALL Americans, rather than only complaining about the violation of your own constitutional rights.

Holy marketing mashup:

Monsters University Brand Diapers

The Associated Press is reporting that the Obama Administration has acknowledged seizing two months of private telephone records from at least 100 of its journalists in at least four of its centers of operations. “It is unknown whether a judge or a grand jury signed off on the subpoenas,” the organization reports.

The Washington Post provides the following comments from the President of the Associated Press:

obama smashes press“There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters. These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP’s newsgathering operations, and disclose information about AP’s activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.

We regard this action by the Department of Justice as a serious interference with AP’s constitutional rights to gather and report the news.”

Were search warrants filed?

Were the phone records used to retaliate against journalists on political reporting?

How can this action be reconciled with the 1st Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of the press?

What legal limits to his powers of search and seizure does Barack Obama comply with any more?

Will Congress investigate Obama?

Will Democrats excuse this use of power?

Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy comments: “The burden is always on the government when they go after private information, especially information regarding the press or its confidential sources. … On the face of it, I am concerned that the government may not have met that burden. I am very troubled by these allegations and want to hear the government’s explanation.”

The Most Lazy Movie Poster Ever

May 13th, 2013 | Posted by F. G. Fitzer in Media - (1 Comments)

All roads lead to this?!? Lead to what? To a road, with a guy, and a car?!?

I notice that the car is in the middle of a road that appears to lead nowhere. Roads lead to more roads? Cars lead to more cars?

fast and furious 6I realize it’s the sixth movie in the superficial Fast and Furious series, but couldn’t the people who designed this movie poster have put just a little more work into this?