Indications of the last two months are that the privatized presidential election corporation called Americans Elect is shuttering its state operations while maintaining a nominal national presence. The latest Americans Elect state affiliate to go defunct is that of Maine; an annual report from Americans Elect in Maine was due at the end of May but despite Americans Elect’s extensive investment of money in Maine’s U.S. Senate race this past fall, no report has not been filed.

As Americans Elect continues to wind down, Richard Winger of Ballot Access News brings our attention to a new political corporation on the horizon “1787 for America,” also known as the “1787 National Committee, Inc.”

As of today, the 1787foramerica.org website of this Section 527 corporation is hidden behind a password-protected wall, but some information has been leaking out in advance of a public rollout. Thanks to Chairman Emily Mathews’ filing with the Federal Election Commission, the corporate bylaws have been published — read their full text here. In those bylaws, the 1787 National Committee, Inc. shows a clear intention to field a candidate for President of the United States in 2016, running under a corporate model very similar to that of Americans Elect. As with Americans Elect, Americans will be able to sign up as “members” of the 1787 National Committee and are supposed to be able to cast votes for candidates for President, but also as with Americans Elect these “members” will not have any say in the actual governance of the 1787 National Committee. Instead, as with Americans Elect, the self-appointed corporate board of directors (and any board-appointed successors) will have sole power in the running of the “1787 for America” process — including making changes to the bylaws that determine how the presidential election will be run.

For now, there are elements in the tentative presidential election process of “1787 for America” that are improvements over the Americans Elect process. Any candidate who is constitutionally qualified to run for president will be supposedly eligible to run under the 1787 for America system. All meetings are according to the bylaws supposed to be open, without secret ballots, and with all minutes posted online for the public to see within 15 days of their occurrence.

Of course, according to Chairman Emily Mathews, “the Board of Directors has met ten times,” and yet all information on the 1787foramerica.org website is hidden from the public behind a password wall. Maybe that’s about to change — wait and see.

Also wait and see what kind of platform or agenda the “1787 National Committee” will or will not be rolling out before you jump on the bandwagon. This may or may not be influenced by the agenda of its organizers. For now, it may be helpful for you to know that the official address of “1787 for America”, on New York City’s famed Madison Avenue, is the same as the official address of Mathews Global Consulting LLC, a firm also headed by Emily that specializes in strategy, risk management and public relations for its clients.

As the 2014 and 2016 elections gear up, expect political organizers to try and learn from the successes and mistakes of groups like Americans Elect in the 2012 election. What will be emulated? What will be improved upon? Who and what may newly imperil the integrity of American politics? Watch and wait. Wait and watch. Always watch.

The political corporation called Americans Elect has made the act of getting sillier, and sillier, and sillier look like an art form. The latest act of Americans Elect is gallery-worthy.

Last week, Americans Elect leaders Doug Bailey (Unity08 cofounder and Americans Elect candidate recruiter) and Les Francis (Americans Elect Board of Advisors) wrote an editorial in which they declared their intention to reawaken Americans Elect for the presidential election season of 2016.

Why Americans Elect? What cure for nasty American politics can Americans Elect possibly bring to the table in 2016? Here’s the the cure Bailey and Francis articulate:

It seems inevitable that after this election — unless the victors show the necessary imagination and guts — that another independent effort will be renewed and essential for 2016…. Just imagine: A ticket in the middle that runs only positive ads like this:

“You won’t see many of these ads from us because we have ruled out all corporate gifts and super PAC sabotage of our democracy. We believe that we can make the American Dream real again for all our people by recognizing that we are all in this together and must work together to meet the challenges facing our nation.”

Americans Elect isn’t a Super PAC? Read the definition of Super PAC here: an “independent expenditure-only” group to which corporations and individuals can make unlimited contributions. Americans Elect accepted $1.75 million in unregulated money from just three people, all Wall Street tycoons. It’s been spending the money on independent expenditures to support the Senate campaign of Angus King and to oppose the Senate campaign of Charlie Summers. Americans Elect fits the definition of a Super PAC to a tee.

Americans Elect has ruled out all corporate gifts? $750,000 of Americans Elect’s $1.75 million windfall came in the form of a check written from the account of a hedge fund corporation called Passport Capital.

It would take a lot of guts to be a corporate beneficiary Super PAC condemning corporate beneficiary Super PACs…

… except that hardly anyone seems to notice or care any more. Americans Elect will have no reason to stop railing against corporate Super PACs while being one of them, not until its falsehood carries a price.

Hillary Clinton 2016?

April 17th, 2012 | Posted by Rowan in Democrats | Election 2016 | Politics | Shirts - (4 Comments)

It’s been Pinned. It’s been Facebooked. Twitters have tweeted.

This week, the most talked about presidential candidate isn’t even a presidential candidate… at least not in 2012. She may be in 2016.

clinton for president tshirtThe meme of Hillary Clinton for President in 2016 has surged online. Over at our Presidential campaign t-shirt shop, Hillary Clinton for President tshirts have by far outsold Barack Obama shirts this week. The most popular proclaims, I supported Hillary Clinton before it was cool to support Hillary Clinton.

What’s going on with this idea? Where did it come from?

Is the growing popularity of Hillary 2016 due to a quality that Clinton has herself, or is it due more to fatigue with the Obama vs. Romney contest we’re currently supposed to be focused on?

Would you support Hillary Clinton for President in 2016? Why or why not?