If your politics are anywhere to the left of Pat Robertson, the two major parties offer no viable option in the Tennessee Senate race.

Consider the Republican incumbent, Bob Corker. Corker may have good hair, but he’s got a nasty policy record. In 2011 Corker blocked a move to end special tax breaks for big oil corporations at a time when big oil reaps huge profit. Months after the BP oil disaster, Senator Corker cosponsored a bill to automatically approve oil drilling applications without review. Bob Corker voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act without reform and without debate. Net Neutrality? Bob Corker’s against it. Indefinite detention of Americans without charge? Bob Corker’s for it. Repeatedly for it. Bob Corker is an authoritarian oil whore.

Then there’s Mark Clayton. Clayton is the Democratic Party nominee competing to take Bob Corker’s seat. Clayton is Vice President of a group called Public Advocate of the United States that opposes equal rights for gay and lesbian people and wants to require Americans to practice compulsory Christianity.

What’s a reasonable person to do? Refuse to be limited to these unacceptable alternatives. Look for other alternatives. One place to cast your vote in protest is with Jim Maynard, a write-in candidate for Senate. A veteran progressive activist in Memphis, Maynard mounted a surprisingly strong write-in campaign challenging conservative Democratic incumbent Harold Ford Jr in 2004. After Clayton’s outrageous nomination this year, Jim Maynard has put his name forward as a write-in candidate, a receptacle for all the people who refuse to roll over and play patsy for the conservative agenda. Maynard offers a pretty succinct reason for people to write him in: you want to oppose anti-gay theocratic bigots? Write in me: I’m a humanist gay man! You can read about Maynard’s principled prior write-in bid here, you can follow Maynard’s platform and candidacy right here, and you can find bumper stickers, buttons and shirts to promote the Maynard for Senate write-in campaign over here.

Tennesseans, some people would rather you didn’t know it, but you do have a choice in the Senate. One good choice is to write in Jim Maynard for Senate.

Update, August 10: Jim Maynard has rolled out an official Maynard for Senate web page.

Here’s a bumper sticker I’ve seen in a few places but that I just don’t understand:

“The Point of Life is to Live It.”

What does that mean? Is there an alternative?

Joe Barton for President and BP for Vice President: it’s the perfect ticket for 2012. Joe Barton’s already bought by the oil companies, after all, so you know they’re close to begin with. Sticky and oily, greasy and filthy, the Barton-BP 2012 ticket would be a combination just like Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, except carcinogenic.

I’ve got me a couple of campaign slogans for the Barton-BP team already. Can you help me come up with a few more?

Joe Barton-BP 2012 Bumper Sticker: Oil Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry Bumper Sticker
Joe Barton-BP 2010 Bumper Sticker with an oily GOP Elephant: Let's Make It Official!

For sale on the WorldNetDaily shop:

Magnify Your God Bumper Sticker

Why do the Republicans belittle poor Yahweh so?

I miss Sarah Palin already. I’ll always cherish the happy moments. The warm grins over the repeated use of the word “also” to end a sentence, the special feeling we all got from discovering another connection to witch hunters, the secret hope that Sarah Palin might donate part of her $150,000 wardrobe to a goodwill around the corner from us so that we might fondle the buttons…

Memories aren’t enough. I want more:

Liberal Humorists for Sarah Palin 2012 bumper sticker

A Van\'s Bumper Sticker Change, from Clinton to ObamaYou can’t really see the detail in this photo I snapped from the passenger’s side of my vehicle traveling down Interstate 71 in Ohio, so you’ll have to trust me when I tell you that on the lower left hand side, the van’s owner placed an Obama 08 bumper sticker over a Hillary Clinton 2008 bumper sticker.

I have yet to see a single example on the roads of a pro-McCain bumper sticker placed over a pro-Clinton bumper sticker.

Irregular aphorism:

Minds are like parachutes – They only work if you’ve jumped out of an airplane first.

they only wrk if you jump out of an airplane first

As the Pennsylvania primary looms, another week has passed in the 2008 presidential race, and that means it’s time to take another peek at our Election-related sales statistics. Since the election debacle of 2004, we’ve kept track of committed support for various 2008 presidential contenders, indicated by sales of Election 2008 bumper stickers, magnets, buttons, lawn signs, American Apparel t-shirts and lapel stickers supporting Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

While polls measure fickle opinions, our measure tracks the stronger commitment marked by the laying down of cash to promote a candidate in public. The more strongly committed are more likely to actually get out there and vote. The following is the percent share of sales of our Election 2008 gear in the past week of April 13 to April 19, 2008:

Barack Obama 2008: 91.0%
Hillary Clinton 2008: 8.1%
Mike Gravel 2008: 0.0%
Others: 0.9%

I hate to sound like a broken record, but when the results fit a repetition, a repetition it must be: This has been another great week of sales for Barack Obama, another not-so-great week of sales for Hillary Clinton, and another disastrous week of sales for Mike Gravel, the candidate who’s decided he wants the Libertarian Party to take him in.

Postscript: for the last two weeks, I’ve wanted to share with you CafePress’ overall sales statistics for 2008 presidential election candidates. I’ve had two reasons for that desire. First, it’s a way of showing that beyond our own shops, sales in general by CafePress have followed the trend we report (which is true up through April). Second, it’s a way of looking at patterns in sales of bumper stickers promoting John McCain’s candidacy. We’d never sell pro-McCain bumper stickers because we oppose him as a presidential candidate, but CafePress’ Election Meter web page has featured statistics on McCain gear sales from all CafePress shops since November of 2007.

Did I write “has” in that last sentence? It would be more appropriate to write “had.” Since April 5, CafePress hasn’t updated its sales statistics on its Election Meter page. Did they tire of it? We’ll keep reporting here.