The Facebook business model is built on the presumption that advertisers will pay a premium click-through rate because the Facebook corporation, through the super genius of social media marketing algorithms, is able to provide the ability to create advertising campaigns that precisely target the very people who will be most receptive to the advertised message. That’s the theory of Facebook’s business. The reality of Facebook’s business model is that it profits by targeting dim-witted advertisers who are willing to pay exorbitant rates because they actually believe the hype about the state of social media marketing.

A case in point is Lay’s, the potato chip company.

When I was a child, I liked potato chips. In my adult years, however, my rate of potato chip consumption has dwindled. I don’t like getting my fingers greasy. I don’t like the rattle of the bags. I don’t really like the taste of potato chips anymore either – regardless of the flavorings that are sprayed on. I may not even buy one bag of potato chips per year. I don’t spend my time online talking about potato chips, either. Snacks in general are not a topic of conversation for me, either, and if I do talk about a snack, it will likely be ice cream that excites my attention – a food that is not generally thought to combine well with potato chips.

My point is that I am not in the market for potato chips. There’s no Facebook activity on my part to suggest that I’m a potato chips fan.

Nonetheless, Facebook has convinced the Lay’s potato chip company to spend money to insert an advertisement for potato chips into my Facebook timeline. The advertisement is below:

stupid social media marketing

This ad is supposed to be an example of savvy social media marketing because it encourages Facebook users to become engaged with the lays brand of potato chips, rather than just passively seeing a message. This advertisement can’t truly be called savvy, however, because it’s been sent to people who couldn’t care less about potato chips.

I can tell from this ad that Lays wants people to vote on which of its new potato chip flavors should be kept. But what are those new flavors? I can’t tell from the graphic that’s included in this ad. All I can see is that there are three potato chip bags in three different colors – and so I’m left to imagine what kind of weird potato chip flavor Lay’s had decided to add onto the already overstuffed potato chip market. Pickles and peanut butter? Chocolate espresso bean? Vinegar cotton candy? All I can imagine are desperate attempts at ingenuity that were tested through that junk food of research techniques: Focus groups.

I don’t dispute that there is a lot of information out there with which Facebook could effectively design targeted advertising campaigns for its clients. The evidence suggests, however, that this information is not being intelligently used – either by Facebook, or by the dense corporate marketing committees that use Facebook’s services.

The quality of the Facebook experience has significantly degraded in recent years. Friends’ updates often don’t show up on the feeds, while the Facebook screen becomes increasingly crowded with advertisements that are completely unrelated to anything I have ever liked or will ever like. Facebook tracks user activities, even when users aren’t on Facebook, and sells the information. This year, the Facebook site will suffer another blow when it allows advertisers to place loud video advertisements on top of the content that Facebook users are trying to get to.

wtf facebookOn top of all this, Facebook announced today that it’s created a new system of software for Android smart phones, called Facebook Home. What’s the big deal about Facebook Home?

- Facebook Home gives its users a suite of apps… that merely replicate the functions that are already available on other apps.

- Facebook Home allows its users to chat with friends… which they can already do without Facebook Home.

- Facebook Home enables users to check their Facebook streams… which they already can do with a normal Facebook app.

- Facebook Home apps can be moved around with a movement of a finger… just like other Android apps already can.

- Facebook Home puts a barrier in front of other, non-Facebook apps, making them more difficult to use.

- Facebook Home will bring more advertisements onto users’ smart phone screens.

- Facebook Home will send even more of users’ personal information to Facebook HQ, where the information will be sold to support all manner of marketers seeking to inundate Facebook users with off-target, tacky promotions.

I understand why Facebook executives are excited about Facebook Home. It gives them tighter control of more screens, creating more income streams for their corporation.

What I don’t understand is what the benefit is for Facebook users. Why would anyone allow Facebook to hijack their smart phones with Facebook Home?

After Facebook moved a few years back to sell user data, I withdrew my personal membership and remain a non-user personally. However, I’ve been part of maintaining an Irregular Times Facebook Page since then as a way of sharing some of our stories on a different platform. Over the last week or so, I’ve noticed “Posts” like this appearing on the Irregular Times News Feed more and more often:

United Background Check is a Facebook Spam Operation

The first few times I saw these oddities, I assumed that some Facebook “friend” of Irregular Times had been tackily posting an endorsement. But then today I noticed the title — “United Background Checks” — as the entity making the post to my News Feed. “Hang on,” I said to myself, “I haven’t liked United Background Check!” After a second look I notice that this is a “sponsored post” — an advertisement posing as something shared by my friends.

I’m not the only person noticing these sponsored posts. Businesses are feeling extorted because the emergence of the “sponsored post” came at the same time that regular, non-paid posts stopped appearing regularly on followers’ news feeds. Others are asking why there’s no option to remove them.

What do you think? Is the insertion of advertisements that look like posts simply what’s to be expected and tolerated? Or is this step too much?

In the wake of the shooting deaths of 20 children at an elementary school, in Newtown, Connecticut, Facebook members across the United States have banded together to provide relief to the parents of the victims. They have launched a group called Overwhelmed For Newtown, which has over two and a half million members so far.

newtown connecticut tragedyElsie Harport, who founded the group, explained that, “Although I live 2,500 miles away from Newtown, I feel as if I know the victims personally, and am devastated at their loss. I have seen pictures of Newtown myself on both the Internet, through Goople Maps, and television – in high definition. What Barack Obama said about us all being overwhelmed by this tragedy expresses just how I feel. I was so emotionally overwhelmed, I was on Facebook for 5 hours straight this afternoon, and told the kids that they’ll just have to have bowls of cereal for dinner because Mommy can’t handle cooking right now.”

The organization aims to help the people of Newtown by encouraging more people to make Facebook posts expressing sadness about the school shooting. “We know that the families of the people killed in Newton are being emotionally sustained by the Facebook postings of complete strangers right now,” says Harport. “So, our goal is to get one million more people posting about how the school shooting has personally destroyed their emotional well-being, and then, the families of the victims won’t be sad anymore. Our long term goal is to get one billion people to like the Overwhelmed for Newton Facebook group, and then we can use the power of that connectedness to raise some of the children from the dead. It’s so wonderful the way we can all come together through social media to make a difference in this way.”

Readwrite follows up on some strange social media patterns, and discovers that Facebook is reanimating the dead, and using them to promote corporate presence in social media.

Check your like list, Facebookers. Does it have brains?

facebook zombie social media

Facebook Rule #542

November 22nd, 2012 | Posted by Jim Cook in Media - (0 Comments)

Facebook Rule #542: If It's Written on a Stock Background Then It's Truthier

Facebook Suggests Hitman For Me

November 21st, 2012 | Posted by jclifford in Media - (2 Comments)

The mythology of Big Data tells the story of advertisements that are intelligently targeted to individual wants and needs, using intelligent data models to present sponsored messages to people who are most likely to respond positively to them.

social media Big Data failWell, Big Data beacon Facebook just presented me with a sponsored post suggesting that I “like” and become “friends” with a hitman.

Hitman is represented by a bald guy carrying two guns. I have lots of hair, and I hate guns.

What on earth could Big Data know about me that would lead it to conclude that I am interested in a hitman?

This gives a whole new meaning to the concept of “targeting consumers” with online advertisements.

Hubspot is a marketing channel for business consultants, connecting consultants with potential future clients. The Hubspot method is fairly simple: It advertises free “ebooks” dealing with the area of consultants’ expertise. Those people downloading the ebooks give their contact information, and some data about their position in business, in return for the download. That information is then used so that the participating consultants can contact the downloaders who are the most likely to become profitable clients.

There’s nothing wrong with this approach, in theory. The ebook bait is fairly transparent, so that everyone involved has a good idea of what’s really going on.

hubspot drivelThe problem with Hubspot is one of quality. The marketing insights and services hawked by its consultants are typically filled with superficial methods and shoddy reasoning.

An example is shown in the Hubspot ad you see here, linking to a promotional ebook that hypes the value of advertising on Facebook. Facebook advertisements actually have an infamously low rate of useful response, but the Hubspot ad suggests otherwise, stating, “Fact: 42& of marketers say that Facebook is critical or important to their business.”

Stop for a minute, and do the math. If 42 percent of marketers say that Facebook is critical or important to their business, that means that most marketers say that Facebook is not critical or important to their business. A majority of marketers aren’t too hot about the idea of marketing with Facebook, according to this ad. That’s not much of an endorsement.

But then, we also need to reflect on the quality of the measurement the ad promotes. Why does it matter what marketers think about the business relevance of Facebook? Marketers aren’t the people most businesses sell to. What potential customers think about Facebook matters more.

Even considering this, a person’s opinion about the efficacy of Facebook for business isn’t a very good measure of the reality of the efficacy of Facebook for business. Marketing has always been crammed full of methods that marketers sincerely believe in, but which don’t actually work. The effectiveness of advertising in general is overblown, and these days, the hype about social media marketing is miles beyond what the available data actually indicate.

If the author of this Facebook marketing ebook can’t even remain coherent for the length of a small onscreen ad, why would I give up my private information in exchange for a long-form version of such drivel… or spend 10 days applying its misguided ideas?