Without so much as a wink or a smirk, the official Platform of the Republican Party endorsed by delegates at the 2012 Republican National Convention calls for the outlawing of free speech. Page 14:

Respect for Our Flag: Symbol of the Constitution

The symbol of our constitutional unity, to which we all pledge allegiance, is the flag of the United States of America. By whatever legislative method is most feasible, Old Glory should be given legal protection against desecration.

By whatever legislative means necessary, Republicans want to make free speech less free, criminalizing the “desecration” of the flag in political protest. They want to create a sacred class of objects that Americans are forbidden from disrespecting, from desecrating. They say they want to do it for the sake of the U.S. Constitution they hold so dear. The Constitution reads:

Amendment I.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

No establishment of national flag religion. No restrictions on free speech. No to the Republican ticket in 2012.

In recent days, we’ve noted a number of ways in which Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr has actually opposed American liberty: revocation of Americans’ citizenship rights and American fathers’ parental rights, voting for the Patriot Act, voting to prohibit abortion, and using government to promote discrimination against gays and lesbians.

There’s more. Bob Barr cosponsored a constitutional amendment that would give Congress the power to make burning the flag a criminal act. He did this more than once.

Restricting free speech? That’s not a pro-liberty position. It’s an authoritarian position. It holds that people should only be able to express sentiments that Bob Barr likes.

No, Bob Barr hasn’t repudiated his past actions to end freedom of speech. In fact, the issues section of his presidential campaign website has nothing whatsoever to say about freedom of speech.

Liberty’s candidate?