The FreedomWorks For America Super PAC tosses the mantle of Less Government and the sash of Freedom about its well-endowed shoulders:

FreedomWorks for America endorses true champions of freedom and supports them on the ground with our battle-tested, grassroots get-out-the-vote techniques…. these candidates have been consistent voices for… less government and more freedom.

Let’s fact check that by taking the complete list of all sitting members of the U.S. House of Representatives endorsed by FreedomWorks and seeing how they voted yesterday on H.R. 5949, the bill to reauthorize the FISA Amendments Act for 5 years without any civil liberties reform whatsoever.

The FISA Amendments Act gives the federal government the power to grab Americans’ personal communications and papers without their knowledge, without their permission, and without the judge’s finding of reasonable cause specified in the 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution. Your activity on cell phones, GPS devices, smart phones, online shopping, emails, internet browsing and even your ebooks on your Kindle is vulnerable to being collected by the goverment in warrantless sweeps, and you don’t have to be a criminal to be watched. The government doesn’t have to prove any suspicion of terrorism or other dastardly act. It doesn’t have to prove anything to anybody about what it’s been seizing and who it’s been seizing from — not since the FISA Amendments Act was passed.

Because it abrogates Americans’ 4th Amendment freedoms without reform, yesterday’s vote by the House of Representatives to extend FISA Amendments Act powers for 5 years is a vote for more government, not less. A vote for H.R. 5949 is a vote against American freedoms, not for them. If FreedomWorks really is all about freedom and smaller government, then FreedomWorks should not be endorsing members of Congress who erode freedom and expand government power.

Without further ado, here’s how each FreedomWorks-endorsed incumbent voted on H.R. 5949:

Republican Rep. Ann Marie Buerkle (NY-25): FreedomWorks endorsed, voted for big government surveillance without warrants

Republican Rep. Mike Coffman (CO-6): FreedomWorks endorsed, voted for big government surveillance without warrants

Republican Rep. Steve King (IA-5): FreedomWorks endorsed, voted for big government surveillance without warrants

Republican Rep. Jeff Landry (LA-3): FreedomWorks endorsed, voted for big government surveillance without warrants

Republican Rep. David Schweikert (AZ-5): FreedomWorks endorsed, voted for big government surveillance without warrants

Republican Rep. Joe Walsh (IL-8): FreedomWorks endorsed, voted for big government surveillance without warrants

Republican Rep. Allen West (FL-22): FreedomWorks endorsed, voted for big government surveillance without warrants

Fact check result: Judging by endorsements, this Super PAC ought to rename itself AntiFreedomWorks.

In the audience at last night’s speech to Congress by Barack Obama, U.S. Representative Jeff Landry was spotted holding up a sign that read “Drilling = Jobs”.

offshore drilling jobsDrilling = Jobs? Not for most Americans, maybe. For Congressman Jeff Landry, though, the job security from offshore drilling couldn’t be better.

You see, it’s oil corporations and offshore drilling companies that put Jeff Landry into the U.S. House of Representatives in the first place. Donations associated with just one offshore drilling company, Edison Chouest Offshore, brought $26,900 into his congressional campaign last year. Landry took $182,050 from oil and gas companies – at least that’s what’s on the books. Independent expenditures on behalf of Landry aren’t so easy to keep track of, given that many such donations weren’t even reported to the FEC.

If you were given that kind of money, wouldn’t you feel willing to hold up a sign at a speech on behalf of your corporate benefactors?

To be fair, I have to admit that there are some jobs that are created as a result of offshore drilling. Public relations professionals are often hired to explain why we should ignore oil spills along America’s shores, for example. There are also large numbers of people hired to clean crude oil off U.S. beaches.

I think we can find better ways to stimulate the economy.

In today’s primary election in Louisiana, the U.S. Senate seat currently held by David Vitter is up for grabs. Vitter is running for re-election, but has two challengers: Nick Accardo and Chet Traylor. Accardo lacks a campaign web site, and Traylor’s site now features only advertisements for online resources such as “Free Sugar Daddy Dating”. On the Democratic side, U.S. Representative Charles Melancon, a right wing Democrat, is competing only against minor players Cary Deaton and Neeson Chauvin, whose campaigns are so anemic that they lack even the most basic presence on the Internet. It looks like a fair bet that the two party establishments’ choices will win the Senate primary today. Indeed, with about 65 percent of the precincts now reporting, Melancon and Vitter are far, far ahead of their rivals.

The state of Louisiana has seven congressional districts, but there are primary contests in only four of these districts – and only for one political party in some of those. Most Louisiana voters don’t have a choice for who will stand for them in the general election for the U.S. House of Representatives this November. The 1st, 6th, and 7th districts lack competitive primaries. In the 5th, 6th, and 7th districts, there is no Democratic candidate at all. Remember that these districts were never put into play by the Democratic Party when you read stories about the Republicans’ advantage this year. The Democrats certainly can’t win in districts where they don’t even bother to put forward a candidate.

In the 2nd congressional district, incumbent Joseph Cao, who won a special election to his seat just this year, faces no Republican challenger. There are four Democrats competing for the right to challenge Cao in the general election this year, however: Cedric Richmond, Juan LaFonta, Gary Johnson and Eugene Green. At this hour, only one fifth of precincts are reporting in this district, but the vote so far shows Richmond with almost a 45 percent lead over the other Democratic candidates. Update: With 100 percent of the vote counted, Richmond has maintained nearly a 40 point lead.

There is no contest for the Democratic nomination for the 3rd district seat, being vacated by Senate candidate Charles Melancon. Ravi Sangisetty is the only Democrat running. There are three Republicans contending for their party’s nomination in this district, though: Hunt Downer, Jeff Landry and Kristian Magar. 80 percent of 3rd district precincts are now reporting vote tallies, and Landry has a 15 percent lead, with Hunt Downer in second place. Update: Trailing by just over 13 points, Hunt Downer still has gained enough of the vote to take part in a runoff election against Jeff Landry.

Incumbent John Fleming, who has pledged to wage a battle against atheists in order to transform the United States into a “Christian nation, is the only Republican running in the 4th congressional district. Steven Gavi and David Melville are competing for the Democratic nomination. With 73 percent of precincts reporting, Melville seems the certain winner, with a lead of over 60 percent. Update: Melville won, 81 percent to 19 percent.

In the 5th district, incumbent Rodney Alexander, who turned coat several years ago and switched from the Democratic Party to the Republicans, is facing a primary challenge from Todd Slavant. Slavant’s campaign hasn’t gained much traction, however, and with only 92 percent of precincts reporting, has only earned 10.7 percent of the vote. In spite of Alexander’s betrayal of them, the Louisiana Democrats aren’t running a candidate to try to take this seat away from him. That’s a big zero percent for the 5th district Democrats.