The disaster of the oil spill from a pipeline in Mayflower, Arkansas began just two months ago. 19 members of the U.S. House of Representatives seem to have forgotten that the environmental catastrophe ever took place, though. Last night, they voted along with every Republican member of the House to approve a special exemption from regulation for the proposed XL pipeline, which is designed in violation of environmental protections, and would snake its way across the USA all the way from Canada down to the Gulf of Mexico in Texas.

These 19 Democrats were:

John Barrow
Sanford Bishop
Cheri Bustos
Jim Cooper
Jim Costa
Henry Cuellar
Bill Enyart
Al Green
Gene Green
Ruben Hinojosa
Sean Maloney
Jim Matheson
Mike McIntyre
Patrick Murphy
Collin Peterson
Terri Sewell
Filemon Vela
John Yarmuth

… plus one other mystery Democrat, perhaps. The Library of Congress says that there were 19 Democrats who voted for the bill, but counting this list, there appear to be just 18.

against north american free trade agreementAt the beginning of the 113th Congress, two bills that could lead to the end of the North American Free Trade Agreement have been introduced to the House of Representatives.

H.R. 191, introduced by Marcy Kaptur, a Democrat from central Ohio, would dissolve NAFTA unless new provisions to diminish the negative economic impact of the agreement could be negotiated with Canada and Mexico.

H.R. 156, introduced by Mike McIntyre, a Democrat from North Carolina, wouldn’t bother with the preliminaries. It would simply end U.S. involvement in the NAFTA agreement.

No one in the U.S. Senate has introduced any legislation having to do with NAFTA.

At the end of last week, the U.S. House of Representatives voted on H.R. 6169, a Republican economic bill that would give millionaires and billionaires lower tax rates, supposedly in the interest of creating jobs. Of course, after George W. Bush and Congress teamed up to lower tax rates on millionaires and billionaires, jobs were not created. Jobs were lost. So, there’s no good reason to think that H.R. 6169, if passed into law, would do anything but harm to employment prospects in the United States.

However, U.S. Representative Louise Slaughter tried to fix that. She offered an amendment to H. 6169 that would have ended tax incentives for corporations to move American manufacturing jobs to foreign countries. The Slaughter amendment would also have ended tax exemptions for overseas accounts in places like the Cayman Islands and the Bahamas, shelters that the wealthy use to evade their responsibility as citizens of the United States.

Not a single Republican voted for Slaughter’s amendment. Not all Democrats voted for it, however. Ten Democrats joined the Republicans, voting to protect secret offshore bank accounts and to help corporations move jobs outside of the United States.

us capitol animationThese ten anti-jobs Democrats were:

- Dan Boren – retiring from the House of Representatives at the end of the year
- Jim Cooper, who is being challenged from the left this year by Green Party candidate John Miglietta
- Jim Costa, who is switching over to California’s new 16th district this year
- Joe Donnelly, who is leaving the House of Representatives to campaign for a U.S. Senate seat this year
- Larry Kissell, the incumbent in North Carolina’s 8th congressional district
- Dan Lipinski, the incumbent in 3rd congressional district of Illinois
- Jim Matheson, challenged this year by Justice Party candidate Torin Nelson
- Mike McIntyre, the incumbent in North Carolina’s 7th congressional district
- Adam Schiff, considered the incumbent in California’s new 28th congressional district
- Heath Shuler, who is retiring from Congress at the end of this year.

The next time you get an email or telephone call from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee asking for a donation, ask what the DCCC intends to do about these serially anti-populist Democratic members of Congress.

If you care about economic justice, if you care about peace, pay attention to the names in the list below. Look for the name of your U.S. Representative in Congress.

Gary Ackerman, Jason Altmire, Robert Andrews, Joe Baca, John Barrow, Shelley Berkley, Howard Berman, Sanford Bishop, Tim Bishop, Dan Boren, Leon Boswell, Bob Brady, Corrine Brown, Russ Carnahan, John Carney, Ben Chandler, Judy Chu, Gerald Connolly, Jim Cooper, Jim Costa, Joe Courtney, Mark Critz, Henry Cuellar, Elijah Cummings, Susan Davis, Norm Dicks, John Dingell, Lloyd Doggett, Joe Donnelly, Eliot Engel, Charles Gonzalez, Al Green, Gene Green, Colleen Hanabusa, Martin Heinrich, Brian Higgins, Ruben Hinojosa, Mazie Hirono, Kathy Hochul, Tim Holden, Steny Hoyer, Steve Israel, Sheila Jackson Lee, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Jim Jordan, Marcy Kaptur, Dale Kildee, Larry Kissell, James Langevin, John Larson, Sander Levin, Dan Lipinski, David Loebsack, Jim Matheson, Carolyn McCarthy, Carolyn McCarthy, Mike McIntyre, Jim McNerney, Gregory Meeks, Bill Owens, Ed Pastor, Ed Perlmutter, Collin Peterson, Silvestre Reyes, Laura Richardson, Mike Ross, Dutch Ruppersberger, Adam Schiff, David Scott, Terri Sewell, Brad Sherman, Heath Shuler, Albio Sires, Adam Smith, Betty Sutton, Ed Towns, Nikki Tsongas, Peter Visclosky, and Tim Walz

These are the names of the 77 Democrats in the House of Representatives who voted on Friday in favor of passing H.R. 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.

You may remember how, last year, Republicans in Congress pushed Democrats into what was called a “compromise”. The deal was that a Special Committee from the House and Senate would be authorized to come up with a plan for reducing the budget deficit, through increases in revenue or through reductions in spending. That committee had a deadline to come up with a plan, and if they didn’t meet that deadline, then there would be automatic spending reductions in programs like Medicare and the military.

There would be no new taxes if the deadline wasn’t met, though, so the Republicans on that Special Committee just sat there, with no intention to come up with any plan, happy to let the spending reductions go into place. This year, there were supposed to be automatic reductions in money for Medicare and for the military alike.

The cuts in Medicare are coming through, but with the version of the National Defense Authorization Act just passed by the House of Representatives, the cuts in military spending do not take place. A vote for this legislation, essentially, is a vote to allow cuts in Medicare without any counter-balancing cuts in military spending or tax increases. It’s a vote to put all the economic burden onto working Americans, while allowing the wealthy to keep their special tax loopholes.

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 as passed by the House of Friday preserves spending on extravagant weapons program that the Pentagon says it doesn’t want. It keeps open redundant military bases that are not strategically necessary.

The money to pay for this wasteful military spending is being taken from older Americans, by reducing their health care benefits.

Who would vote for such a thing? Well, almost every Republican in the House of Representatives voted in favor of this unjust redistribution of wealth. It’s not just a Republican problem, though. The 77 Democrats listed above voted to approve this unjust arrangement as well.

These Democratic politicians don’t deserve to be re-elected. If you are represented by one of the Democrats listed above, give your representative a call through the congressional switchboard at (202) 224-3121. Ask to be connected to your representative’s office, and leave a simple message with the aide who picks up the phone: I’m a liberal, and I won’t be voting for you in November, and it’s because you voted for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013.

Yesterday, Republican Congressman Trent Franks presented an amendment to H.R. 4310, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. It was approved for addition to the bill, which was then passed later in the day. The support for the amendment was largely Republican, but the following dozen congressional Democrats joined the House Republicans to vote for it:

nuclear explosionJohn Barrow
Sanford Bishop
Dan Boren
Ben Chandler
Henry Cuellar
Jim Matheson
Mike McIntyre
Gary Peters
Collin Peterson
Laura Richardson
Mike Ross
Heath Shuler

The Franks amendment eliminates funding for programs in which the United States cooperates with Russia to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

The reason that Trent Franks, other congressional Republicans and these 12 Democrats gave for eliminating nuclear nonproliferation: Russia has given military aid to Syria.

I don’t know anyone who would argue that the Syrian government is a decent regime deserving of any kind of foreign support. However, Russian support for the Syrian government is a functionally separate issue. If nuclear weapons materials and technology from Russia go unprotected, and are taken by terrorists, mercenaries, or agents of another government, such an incident would do nothing to help overthrow the current Syrian regime. It would only create an additional foreign policy problem, and put the world in even greater risk of a nuclear holocaust.

The amount of spending required for the benefit of protection from nuclear weapons proliferation is minimal. If these dozen Democrats really wanted to save money, they could have voted for another proposed amendment to H.R. 4310, from Congressman Ed Markey. The Markey amendment would have saved a large amount of money by delaying the development of a new generation of bomber aircraft designed specifically to shoot nuclear missiles at foreign cities from a long range.

The Markey amendment was defeated. All but one (Gary Peters) of the dozen Democrats who voted in favor of ending nuclear nonproliferation voted against delaying the development of the expensive nuclear bomber.

The issue isn’t what’s happening in Syria at the moment. It isn’t cutting spending. The issue is nuclear weapons. Too many members of Congress favor the expansion of America’s nuclear weapons, and don’t care to even try to control the spread of nuclear weapons out of Russia.

That’s My Congress points out a case of holy hypocrisy in Congress. The Constitution clearly sets religious matters outside the set of activities that Congress is supposed to deal with, but U.S. Representative Mike McIntyre interrupted the legislative business of Congress this week to give a speech about how all Americans ought to participate in the private, sectarian National Day of Prayer next week (an event that isn’t really national at all, given the religious diversity of the USA).

The oddest part of McIntyre’s little religious rant was when he sermonized, “We know that the true source of power cannot be found here in the Halls of Congress or in the Oval Office in the West Wing or in the chambers of the Supreme Court, but only on our knees before the one who is the true source of power!”

Does Congressman McIntyre really believe that? I don’t think so, because he’s spent his whole career pursuing power through corporate money, and through the power of government, not through prayer. If Mike McIntyre truly believed that true power is found in prayer, rather than in Congress, he’d be back home praying, not working like hell year after year to stay in Congress.

Mike McIntyre doesn’t care enough about prayer to center his own life around the practice, so what right does he have to lecture to the rest of us about how we’re not praying enough? Like most other conspicuously religious politicians, Representative McIntyre is just using prayer as a theatrical prop, to try to gain votes for himself.

Praying loudly in the public square is not what the Jesus suggested. I wish there were someone around to remind Mike McIntyre about that… someone like… gosh, I don’t know who…

The Democratic Party has promised us that it would do whatever it takes to create jobs and improve the economy. Democrats in Congress said that they would work to get a good jobs bill passed, and not waste time with frivolous matters.

That’s not what happened this week. This week, the House of Representatives spent the better part of a day debating, and then voting on, a resolution that has no force in law, but declares that “the people of the United States have turned to God”.

The fact is that the American people are increasingly turning away from belief in God. The American Religious Identification Survey has shown that in the United States there is a trend away from religion in general, and away from Christianity in particular.

So, the resolution passed by the House of Representatives, H. Con. Res. 13, is factually incorrect. More important than that, though, is that it’s constitutionally illegal. The Constitution forbids a government establishment of religion through acts of Congress. Yet, H. Con. Res. 13 reaffirms that “In God We Trust” is the national motto of the United States of America. That’s an establishment of religion through an act of Congress.

Apparently, the U.S. House of Representatives believes that promoting Christianity is more important than defending the Constitution of the United States of America. Somewhere between 15 and 20 percent of the American people, non-Christian Americans, would disagree with that.

163 members of the House of Representatives may now be encountering some serious trouble from the significant non-Christian minority in America. You see, non-Christians in America are more likely to vote than Christians are. They’re more highly educated, and have higher incomes too, which means that they’re more likely to make substantial political donations than Christian Americans are. Non-Christian Americans also tend to vote Democrat – or have in the past.

Will non-Christians vote Democrat in the 2012 congressional elections? Most of them don’t have much reason to any more. Only 8 Democrats in the House of Representatives had the courage to do the right thing and vote against H. Con. Res. 13.

163 Democrats decided to take the cowardly, craven route, and voted along with the House Republicans in favor of the resolution declaring, in defiance of the Constitution, that the United States is a nation of God. The names of these theocratic Democrats are listed below, so that they can be held accountable on Election Day 2012. They do not deserve the votes or the financial support of Non-Christian Americans, and they are rather unlikely to win without it.

Democrats in the U.S. House Who Were Too Busy Promoting Theocracy To Work On A Jobs Bill This Week:

Jason Altmire, Robert Andrews, Joe Baca, Tammy Baldwin, John Barrow, Karen Bass, Xavier Becerra, Shelley Berkley, Howard Berman, Timothy Bishop, Dan Boren, Leonard Boswell, Robert Brady, Bruce Braley, Corrine Brown, G.K. Butterfield, Lois Capps, Michael Capuano, Dennis Cardoza, Russ Carnahan, John Carney, Kathy Castor, Ben Chandler, David Cicilline, Hansen Clarke, Yvette Clarke, William Clay, James Clyburn, Steve Cohen, Gerald Connolly, John Conyers, Jim Cooper, Jim Costa, Mark Critz, Joseph Crowley, Henry Cuellar, Susan Davis, Danny Davis, Peter DeFazio, Diana DeGette, Ted Deutch, Norman Dicks, John Dingell, Lloyd Doggett, Joe Donnelly, Michael Doyle, Donna Edwards, Eliot Engel, Anna Eshoo, Sam Farr, Barney Frank, Marcia Fudge, John Garamendi, Charles Gonzalez, Al Green, Gene Green, Raul Grijalva, Janice Hahn, Colleen Hanabusa, Alcee Hastings, Martin Heinrich, Brian Higgins, James Himes, Maurice Hinchey, Rubén Hinojosa, Mazie Hirono, Kathleen Hochul, Tim Holden, Rush Holt, Steny Hoyer, Jay Inslee, Steve Israel, Jesse Jackson, Sheila Jackson Lee, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Marcy Kaptur, William Keating, Dale Kildee, Ron Kind, Larry Kissell, Dennis Kucinich, James Langevin, Rick Larsen, John Larson, Barbara Lee, Sander Levin, Daniel Lipinski, David Loebsack, Zoe Lofgren, Nita Lowey, Ben Luján, Carolyn Maloney, Edward Markey, Jim Matheson, Doris Matsui, Carolyn McCarthy, Betty McCollum, James McDermott, James McGovern, Mike McIntyre, Jerry McNerney, Gregory Meeks, Michael Michaud, Brad Miller, George Miller, Gwen Moore, James Moran, Grace Napolitano, Richard Neal, John Olver, William Owens, Frank Pallone, William Pascrell, Ed Pastor, Donald Payne, Nancy Pelosi, Ed Perlmutter, Gary Peters, Collin Peterson, Chellie Pingree, Jared Polis, David Price, Mike Quigley, Nick Rahall, Charles Rangel, Silvestre Reyes, Laura Richardson, Mike Ross, Steven Rothman, Lucille Roybal-Allard, C.A. Ruppersberger, Timothy Ryan, Linda Sanchez, Loretta Sanchez, John Sarbanes, Janice Schakowsky, Adam Schiff, Kurt Schrader, Allyson Schwartz, David Scott, Jose Serrano, Terri Sewell, Brad Sherman, Heath Shuler, Albio Sires, Louise Slaughter, Adam Smith, Betty Sutton, Mike Thompson, John Tierney, Paul Tonko, Edolphus Towns, Christopher Van Hollen, Nydia Velazquez, Peter Visclosky, Timothy Walz, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Maxine Waters, Henry Waxman, Peter Welch, Frederica Wilson, Lynn Woolsey, John Yarmuth

These 163 Democrats could have been working on crafting a jobs bill that could pass the House and be signed into law. They could have been working on legislation to end special tax breaks for the wealthy, helping to restore some financial justice to the American economy. They weren’t. They were too busy using the power of government to push the worship of the Christian god. They’ve failed us, not just constitutionally, but economically as well.

too busy with in god we trust to pass a jobs bill

Postscript:

Every day that the House of Representatives is in session, the House Chaplain gets up in front of all members of the lower body of Congress and says a prayer, a magical incantation urging the Christian God to make the U.S. House of Representatives a productive political body. That’s been going on for years and years now, but still, here we are, with astonishingly high unemployment, and Congress hasn’t been able to do anything to make the situation better.

With all the congressional prayers to God, you would think that God would have gotten the message by now – if God existed. But, it seems that, if there is a God, God either doesn’t care about our rotten economy, or is impotent to do anything about it. Certainly, no divine power has given Congress the wherewithal to deal with our nation’s unemployment problem, or with the crisis of financial inequality.

Given the failed record of prayers to God in Congress, I have to wonder just why it is that members of Congress still trust in God. The record of achievement just isn’t there to back up that trust.

This afternoon, in a close-to-party-line vote, the Republican budget plan, which would require extreme cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, education, science, and just about every other good thing that the federal government does, passed the House of Representatives. From there, it will go to die in the Senate.

Amended With Final Vote

It’s a dead end bill, and therefore only worthy of remark in this: Five House Democrats actually crossed party lines to vote for this radical Republican budget legislation. Dan Boren, Heath Shuler, Mike McIntyre, Jim Matheson, and Jim Cooper voted in favor of a budget plan to force working Americans to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction, while leaving millionaire and billionaire trust fund babies with special tax loopholes that let them keep on raking in the cash without doing any work at all.

Really, if they’re going to vote for extremist right wing legislation like whis, why do they bother staying in the Democratic Party at all?