“Most terrorists are Muslim,” say the ultraconservative supporters of religious-based profiling and surveillance in America. The claim is resurfacing in the last week:

Christopher Cook, April 19 2013:

Whatever the specifics, the general fact is always the same: Not all Muslims are terrorists, but nearly all terrorists are Muslims…. Islamist terrorism is now a fact of life. The left would like to create an alternate reality in which they were not the perpetrators of most of the domestic terrorism in United States’ history, but they cannot. So they do the next best thing: they lie.

Craig R. Kelso, April 21 2013:

We were attacked again by terrorists; Muslim terrorists. I know that not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim.

Pappy’s Rants, April 22 2013:

I read recently………not all muslims are terrorists but most terrorists are muslim.

Ruth King, April 23 2013:

Unfortunately, Obama seems driven by a desire to befriend Muslims and demonize those who recognize that, while not all Muslims are terrorists, most terrorists are Muslims and that radical Islam is a clear, present, and dangerous threat…. Many analysts are now questioning whether the atrocity that befell the citizens of Boston will become the “new normal.” It is clear that future attacks are inevitable as long as our government and the president in particular do not call a spade a spade and begin to take all necessary measures to protect American citizens from the evil deeds of Islamists.

Not one of these claims is backed up by an actual count comparing the number of terrorist threats by non-Muslims to those made by Muslims. That’s what you’d need to be able to make a claim like “most terrorists are Muslims”, at least if you cared about facts. These posters don’t care about facts. They just know what they know because they think they know it, facts be damned.

The rest of us who do care about facts can refer to Alejandro J. Beutel’s yearly report, Data on Post-9/11 Terrorism in the United States. Beutel stacks the deck in favor of finding more Muslim terrorists by including both American and foreign Muslim threats against the United States, while only counting American non-Muslims and leaving foreign non-Muslims out.

I last looked at this dataset two years ago, but with data in through June of 2012 and the war-on-Islam freakout voices rising again, it’s time to take another look. The following are the latest available year-by-year statistics on Muslim versus non-Muslim terrorist threats against the United States:

2002
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 5
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 6

2003
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 2
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 8

2004
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 3
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 4

2005
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 2
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 3

2006
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 7
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 2

2007
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 3
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 4

2008
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 3
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 9

2009
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 11
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 19

2010
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 11
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 32

2011
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 10
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 19

First half of 2012
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American or foreign Muslims: 3
# of terrorist threats against the United States by American non-Muslims: 11

The actual, observable and sourced facts show that in every year, the majority of those making terrorist threats against the United States have been non-Muslims.

For years, the New York City Police Department has engaged in massive spying on American Muslims in New York City, in New York State and in other states as well. The surveillance program, designed and partially run by the CIA, spent large amounts of money and time prying into the private lives of people who had done nothing wrong. Muslim Americans being spied upon had committed no crimes and were not suspected of committing any crime; they were only spied upon because of their religion.

And what did this all bring the NYPD? Did New York City authorities catch any terrorists?

No.

The massive evidenceless internal spying operation in America resulted in no convictions in terrorism cases.
NYPD spying led to no arrests in terrorism cases.
Not a single lead was generated.

The New York City Police Department didn’t freely admit this, either. It took a lawsuit to force the deposition in which the NYPD admitted it its spying program had generated absolutely nothing of use.

Coda: This isn’t just an issue for New York City. Despite the fact that NYPD surveillance of innocent Americans didn’t generate a single lead, Obama administration official John Brennan has declared the program to be of vital importance. Now John Brennan has been nominated by Barack Obama to head the CIA, the intelligence agency that set up the NYPD surveillance scheme in the first place.

World Net Daily is doubling down on the Obama-has-a-Muslim-ring claim. On WND the “investigator” Jerome Corsi declared two days ago that “according to Arabic-language and Islamic experts, the ring Obama has been wearing for more than 30 years is adorned with the first part of the Islamic declaration of faith, the Shahada: “There is no god except Allah.’”

Now World Net Daily is declaring that it has a secret and anonymous “Duke Professor” who has “confirmed” the ring is Muslim but has no name: “Reporter Billy Hallowell told Baker he spoke with a professor from Duke who read the article, examined the photos and affirmed the conclusion of the WND experts. ‘Based on what he saw, he said that this is, essentially, Arabic script on the ring and that it is the first part of the Shahada,’ Hollowell said. Hallowell pointed out the professor, who declined to be named, also cautioned that there is Islamic teaching that forbids wearing gold.”

Do you know what WND doesn’t provide? A clear, non-blurry, non-pixellated picture of the “Obama ring.” Instead, it provides this:

There is No God But Allah Obama Ring?  Only if you use a blurry, pixellated graphic.  Fact Check this image against another image below, providing much clearer verification of the non-Islamic nature of the ring.

Fact check it. Now. With your eyes. Just look at a clear close-up image of Barack Obama’s ring.

Barack Obama's Supposedly Muslim Ring, Close Up.  Just Lines and Wiggles

The supposed Islamic script is nowhere on it. It’s a wiggle. That’s all. Nothing else.

(Image source: Snopes)

(Sorry, WND, no link juice for you. Readers, if you want to find these phrases, please use Google. I apologize for the necessary inconvenience.)

POUGHKEEPSIE – The first round of photographs supplied by Jerome Corsi seeming to demonstrate Barack Obama’s true religion, inconclusive at best, have been supplanted by a new round of revelatory photos, conclusively demonstrating the alliance of the current “President of the United States” with a non-Christian religion.

The follow photo evidence, drawn straight from the White House image archive (date: 01-29-09), incontrovertibly establishes the religious affiliation of Barack “Soetoro” Obama:

Barack Obama Religious Ring Closeup #1

Barack Obama Ring Revealed: Closeup #2

Barack Obama Ring Closeup 3: The Religious Imagery on Barack Obama's Ring revealed.  Some kind of Islamic script?

Barack Obama Ring Photograph from White House Footage: Not Islamic Script After All!  Not Muslim Either!  Nothing to do with the Musselmen!  What is this strange religious script on Barack Obama's ring?

Barack Obama's Ring Revealed: An Engraving of the Flying Spaghetti Monster Upon it.  Oh, Waily Waily!

His Noodly Appendage has been revealed. All quail.

Why didn’t the liberal media at MSNBC tell us? I think you know the answer.

I’d call it an October surprise, except that it’s all too predictable.

Right wing writer Jerome Corsi, author of the report “Where’s The REAL Birth Certificate?”, has just published an article asserting that Barack Obama has been wearing a golden ring that marks Obama as a follower of Islam, as the ring carries a portion of of the Shahadah, an Islamic profession of faith.

Corsi writes in this evening’s article, “according to Arabic-language and Islamic experts, the ring Obama has been wearing for more than 30 years is adorned with the first part of the Islamic declaration of faith, the Shahada: ‘There is no God except Allah.’”

The two “Arabic-language and Islamic experts” Corsi cites are by no means neutral. One, Mark A. Gabriel, is an anti-Islam activist, describing himself as “a Christian evangelist. He is also spreading the truth about Islam.” The other, Joel Gilbert, has been an active anti-Obama activist, involved with the Conservative Political Action Committee, having produced one film entitled “Atomic Jihad: Ahmadinejad’s Coming War for Islamic Revival and Obama’s Politics of Defeat”, and another entitled “Dreams From My Real Father”, which repeats the old, debunked assertion that Frank Marshall Davis is Barack Obama’s real father.

Corsi, Gabriel and Gilbert all have the appearance of people with an axe to grind against Barack Obama and against Islam. But, let’s not rely upon ad hominem attacks against their conspiracy theory that Barack Obama is wearing an Islamic ring as a code to indicate solidarity with other Muslims around the world. It’s possible for kooky people to occasionally stumble upon the truth, so let’s look at the facts.

Corsi, Gabriel and Gilbert claim that Barack Obama sometimes wears a golden ring, and that that golden ring has Arabic script on it that reads, when translated into English, “There is no god but Allah.” Let’s look at the evidence itself. Here’s a photograph of Barack Obama’s golden ring, along with some rings that are clearly identified as Shahadah rings worn by actual Muslims.

barack obama shahada hoax

There isn’t much similarity between Barack Obama’s ring and the examples of Shahadah rings that I found. In fact, I couldn’t find a single example of a Shahadah ring that looks anything all like Barack Obama’s ring. (In case you’re wondering, Snopes hasn’t written on this particular conspiracy theory yet.)

Next, let’s look at the part of the Shahadah script that Jerome Corsi, Mark Gabriel and Joel Gilbert say can be seen in the photograph of Obama’s ring, along with other representations of the same piece of the Shahadah script, found elsewhere.

examples of the shahadah script reading there is no god but Allah

As you can see, there is a great deal of variability in representations of the Arabic script of the part of the the Shahadah that is translated as “there is no god but Allah”. The versions of this section of the Shahadah that I could find look little like the script that Corsi and his “experts” say they see on that ring.

But let’s take Corsi’s word for it that the script as he represents it is a coherent, common version of the Shahadah. The truth is, I still don’t see it on Obama’s ring. To me, Obama’s ring looks like it’s got some decorative swirls on it, and nothing more.

Finally, let’s suppose that Jerome Corsi is right, and the squiggles on a ring that Barack Obama sometimes wears do actually represent a part of the Shahadah. So what?

Let’s allow for the sake of argument the further supposition that Barack Obama actually knows that part of the Shahadah is on that ring. So what?

Let’s accept, just to be generous, the idea that wearing a ring with a very abstract representation of a portion of a Shahadah script proves that Barack Obama is himself a Muslim. Even if this is the case, the conclusion I arrive at remains: So what?

The Constitution of the United States clearly states that there is to be no religious test for any public office in the U.S.A. That settles the matter. Barack Obama’s religion is irrelevant.

If Barack Obama is a Christian, I don’t care. If Barack Obama is a Muslim, I don’t care. If Barack Obama believes that he is the reincarnation of the Tibetan Lama of Taxi Cab Enlightenment, I don’t care.

Barack Obama is campaigning for a job. There are rules for what criteria can be used for his selection, and religion is not among those criteria. The job of the President of the United States is not to be a priest. Being President has nothing to do with religion.

So, I say, for once and for all: Shahada, schmahada!

I’m not one to simply post links, but look at this image, think about who’s not going to be rioting and killing innocent people because of it…

… and then ask yourself, who’s making Islam look bad? Some filmmaker, or the crowds of zealots killing people in the name of someone who’s been dead for almost 1400 years?

President Barack Obama gave the green light to child soldiers in Chad, the Congo, and Yemen.

The Lorax markets Mazda SUVs: a thing that everyone, everyone, everyone needs?

When officials conducted a Photo Op to show off their new drones flying over American skies, the people in charge lost control of their robot and it smashed into a SWAT team.

The New York City Police Department is secretly spying on kids who’ve done nothing but be Muslim.

The Democratic-Controlled Senate Judiciary Committee continues to sit on 5 nominations to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which has been empty since Barack Obama took office as President.

Are you cool with that?

Google Correlate is a new research tool used to find out where in the United States the entry of certain search terms is concentrated, and which search terms’ levels of popularity are correlated with one another across the 50 states. The first idea is pretty straightforward: where are people more or less likely to be entering a search term? In other words, where are the cultural ideas of America located? The second idea is less intuitive: which terms are searched for more often in the same sets of states, and less often in the same sets of states too? In other words, what ideas are culturally aligned in the same places?

For a little while now, I’ve been interested in the contentions (to use a charitable term), urban myths and legends (to use a descriptive term) and hoaxes (to use a judgmental term) surrounding President Barack Obama. Setting aside the content of his actual policies for a moment, his presidency has provoked a number of emotionally-charged reactions, each of which is centered around a story about the covert actions of President Obama or his alleged fellow travelers. These have spread widely around the internet and persist despite fact checking. I decided to use Google Correlate to answer two questions:

1. Is it possible to use information about geographic clustering to find new examples of urban legends and hoaxes I’ve never heard of before?
2. Are most of the major urban legends and hoaxes regarding Barack Obama prevalent in the same set of states, or are they divided somehow?

To answer these questions, I generated a snowball sample starting with a particular political hoax message and spreading out to include others. The hoax I started with is a popular but false claim that a bill called HB 1388 has just been passed and signed into law by Barack Obama to give Hamas 20 billion and collect Hamas militants for resettlement in communities of the United States. Messages spreading the untrue claim are now in their third year of making the rounds and show no signs of dying out. Using the Google Correlate service, I generated a list of other search terms which are popular in the same states that the search “HB 1388″ are popular (and which are unpopular in the same states that the search “HB 1388″ is unpopular), using a correlation of at least +0.85 as a cutoff for inclusion on the list. From that list I identified search terms associated with other political hoaxes and urban legends, and using those terms made new lists of search terms fitting similar geographic profiles. I continued the process until there were no new hoaxes or urban legends listed, generating a set of 11 hoaxes and urban legends.

The following sociogram shows which hoax/urban legend search terms were generated from the snowball sample starting with “HB 1388,” and which pairs of terms are strongly correlated in search strength on a state-by-state basis:

Geographic Connections between Urban Myths in Politics: state-by-state correlation of various search terms identified through a snowball sample beginning with "HB 1388," completed June 18 2011

The included terms are:

  • “hb 1388,” the starting point of the snowball sample
  • “Judge David Carter,” referring to the false claim that the federal district court judge had required Barack Obama to produce evidence of his citizenship. Judge Carter actually dismissed the lawsuit making that demand.
  • “americans for freedom of information,” referring to a fake AP article purporting to announce the release of proof that Barack Obama is really named “Barry Soetoro” and applied for admission to Occidental College as an Indonesian citizen.
  • “a license required for your home,” referring to the false claim that cap-and-trade legislation would require homeowners to gain a license showing compliance with energy standards before they could sell their home. Calling it a “Surprise from Obama” is a nice touch, considering that the story’s about a congressional bill and Barack Obama is President, not a legislator. Besides, the cap and trade approach was developed through a collaboration of conservative economists and Republicans. On top of all that, cap-and-trade legislation hasn’t been passed and has been dropped from the congressional agenda.
  • “Obama trial,” referring to a 2010 event held by a conservative pastor at his church during which about 75 got together, had lunch, “ruled” that President Obama was guilty of not being a citizen of the United States, then forwarded the ruling to legal authorities for enforcement. Despite the pastor’s assertion that his event had force of law because the police didn’t shut it down, it was just a show.
  • “Dr. Sam Vaknin,” referring to a chain e-mail signed “Dr. Sam Vaknin” asserting that Barack Obama is a narcissist. A fact check reveals that Vaknin is not a mental health professional, got his PhD from a diploma mill, and at any rate did not write the article. This doesn’t mean that Barack Obama isn’t a narcissist, but it does mean that the article is a hoax.
  • “flight 297 atlanta to houston,” referring to a story the author now admits is fabricated in which 11 Muslim men in “full attire” boarded an airplane in a terrorist dry run, acted shifty, refused to follow the rules, screamed “shut up infidel dog!” at a flight attendant and would have gotten away with it too if it weren’t for a pair of stalwart Texans who stood up to the Muslims (and ineffectual Homeland Security agents), rallied the passengers and the crew, and refused to go along with the terrorist plot.
  • “General Bill Ginn,” a search term referring to an urban legend that… get this… Barack Obama, being interviewed by General Bill Ginn on Meet the Press, explained why he doesn’t wear a flag lapel pin: “I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides…. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all…. I like the song ‘I’d like to Teach the World to Sing.’ If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.” It’s a silly quote, it’s a ridiculous notion that generals interview politicians on Meet the Press, and it’s utter hogwash.
  • “fema concentration camps,” an entry showing that an urban legend can have basis in fact. As H.R. 645 in the House and S. 3476 in the Senate, a bill called the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act proposed to the 111th Congress that “the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations” for humanitarian purposes but also, disturbingly, “to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.” It should be noted, however, that neither H.R. 645 nor S. 3476 were passed out of committee, much less passed by the Congress or signed into law in the 111th Congress. The National Emergency Centers Establishment Act has not even been introduced before the 112th Congress.
  • “muslim stamp,” referring to the incorrect claim that Barack Obama ordered the Postal Service to start issuing stamps for the Muslim holiday of Eid.
  • “dhimmitude,” referring to the not altogether incorrect notion that some Muslims may gain an exemption from requirements to gain health care coverage… which is part of a general exemption in recently passed health care reform legislation (so-called “ObamaCare”) for people opposed to participation in insurance on religious grounds

Was Google Correlate a good way to find out about hoaxes and urban legends related to Barack Obama? Definitely. Of the 11 Obama hoaxes or urban legends Google Correlate pointed me to, I’d never heard a word about 8.

Are the Obama hoaxes and urban legends popular in similar sets of states? The set of 11 identified here appear to be. Between these 11 hoaxes and urban legends there are 55 relationships, 55 opportunities for a correlation of at least +0.85 between the two to appear. In 32 out of the 55 pairs, a correlation this strong did appear. In 8 out of the 55 pairs, the correlation reached a level of at least +0.90. What are these states? You can find out for yourself by Google Correlate query, or you can take my word for it: they’re the same states whose electoral votes went to John McCain in the 2008 election.

But the appearance of this dense cultural web of hoaxes and myths, all concentrated in the McCain states, is at least partially rigged, an product of the snowball sample itself. After all, the hoaxes and myths were found because searches for them across the 50 states occurred with a pattern highly correlated to the pattern of “HB 1388″ searches; it shouldn’t be too surprising that the geographic pattern of the hoaxes and myths are correlated with one another, too.

The bigger question is, are there hoaxes and urban legends surrounding Barack Obama that weren’t dredged up by Google Correlate, ones that aren’t popular or unpopular in the same sets of states? One urban legend is conspicuous in its absence: the claim that Barack Obama is somehow secretly a Muslim. The geographic distribution of that claim isn’t strongly correlated with searches for “HB 1388″ or any of the other 10 hoaxes described above. Google searches asking “is Obama a Muslim” are concentrated in the Bible Belt, and are correlated with a different series of myths and legends that are religious in theme: false claims that Barack Obama had canceled the National Day of Prayer, questions regarding Obama’s identity as the Anti-Christ, searches for signs of The End and people looking for descriptions of dinosaurs in the Bible. As the sociogram below shows, these are correlated with one another to a significant extent; none of them are strongly correlated with searches for “HB 1388″:

Sociogram showing geographic connections between religious myths in politics, as generated through Google Correlate, all with a correlation of at least +0.90

Are there other hoaxes, urban legends or myths regarding Barack Obama that you know of but that don’t appear on either of these two lists, that could be associated with another geographic cluster of anti-Obama culture?