Over the past year, right-wing conspiracy theorists have insisted that under provisions of the “Obamacare” law, all Americans would be forcibly injected with trackable RFID microchips by March 23, 2013. The fact that it is now April 6, 2013 and this hasn’t come to pass is a minor speed bump for the conspiracy theorists — never mind the old date; they now insist that the new irrefutably true deadline for forced RFID microchip implantation is December 31, 2017.

If you’re going continue to make a old claim about a deadline for the apocalypse that has passed, you need new evidence. The website “You Have a Right to Know” trots out a new convenient claim — that Howard Dean confirmed it all just last year:

You Have a Right to Know Website claims that Howard Dean confirmed an obama microcrip rfid implantation mandate.  Problem is, he didn't.

The video that “You Have a Right to Know” (along with other websites like “Before It’s News” and “Christian Video”) refers to is a audio commentary made by self-professed Christian prophet Paul Begley while he watches a video featuring Rep. Jim Moran and ex-Governor Howard Dean.

“This video is from January 2012!,” declares Paul Begley as he insists that it shows proof of a RFID forcible microchipping scheme by the government under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka “Obamacare”). That date is important, because if the town hall meeting occurred then, it would have been after the passage of the Obamacare act into law, lending some minimal credence to Begley’s conspiratorial microchip theory.

Why watch Paul Begley’s second-hand version of this video when you can watch original video of the event for yourself thanks to C-Span? Here’s the clip, featuring a question by one Peggy Connor.

If you head to the dedicated C-Span web page for the complete video, you’ll see that the town hall meeting in the video occurred in August of 2009, not January of 2012. This town hall occurred well before the March 2010 passage of the final version of the act. Problem #1.

If you watch the video clip, you’ll notice that Howard Dean doesn’t confirm any kind of enforced RFID microchip implantation scheme. Problem #2.

Read the text of that final version of “Obamacare” as passed into law and you’ll find no reference to any kind of enforced RFID microchip implantation scheme. Problem #3.

There is only one logical conclusion to draw from these observable facts:

Howard Dean has traveled back in time from January 2012 to August 2009 to plant false evidence of a town hall at the earlier date, while simultaneously using a quantum device to erase all evidence of the true provisions of the bill from government records.

Will the evil never cease?

The conspiracy nuts said President Obama would be implanting special RFID GPS tracking microchips under our skin by March 23, 2013. News with views made a typical prediction:

“The Obama Health Care Bill will require all U.S. citizens and babies to receive a microchip or Medchip by March 23, 2013.”

But, whoops, it’s March 23 2013 now, and the microchips just aren’t here.

What to do? Pull a Millerite maneuver, that’s what. The Obama microchip apocalypse has a new date!

Apocalyptic anti-Obama conspiracy nut Charles Brannan (sorry Charles, no link juice for you) rolls out his new prophesy with a handy new date:

“This device is no more than the size of a grain of rice and Obamacare has plans for everyone to be implanted with this device by December 31, 2017 at the latest; despite what a lot of bloggers out there are saying. Katherine Sebelius and ultimately her boss, Barack Obama have the discretion to mandate this and require your bank accounts be available for immediate payment of any medical visit you make to a hospital or medical facility. Does this make it far-fetched to say that the government can go one step further to require you to need this implant to buy or sell anything?

To find the Antichrist, look at whose name is on the mark. At the present, it looks like Obama’s name will be on the mark, but will he be president when this mark is finally implanted into all the population? As I said before, the implants are supposed to be fully implemented by the end of 2017, which is several months after Obama should no longer be president. However, there is a prophecy Obama is the last president we will ever have, and the prophecies God gave me in my book strongly suggest Obama may still very well be president at that time.”

Always just around the bend and always bent. You’ve got to laugh.

Right wing and other conspiratorial websites like News With Views and Before It’s News have been sharing bold predictions about Obamacare microchips in their headlines, their Facebook posts and their Tweets over the past year or two:

“Micro Chip Implant Coming March 23, 2013″

“The New Health Care (Obama care) law H.R. 3590 Also HR 4872 requires all US citizens to have the RIFD microchip implanted. It will contain all your personal data heath and bank accounts etc. Its also a GPS device being monitored. they can deactivate it at any time if they find you suspicious or not loyal to their government or go against them or their system and you will lose everything you ever had.”

You may have seen these predictions… but now March 23 2013 is HERE! In this video, I look for my microchip … and I find a microchip right there ON MY ARM.

Documentary evidence! What more could you ask for? Oh, it’s here, all right. It’s here.

It’s a hoax, you know.

There is no provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) that will force Americans to have government-tracked rfid microchips implanted under their skin. Just read the law for yourself to verify this.

For those who don’t like to verify anything, there’s the right-wing social media echo chamber. Jump inside the chamber and you’ll find plenty of declarations that by March 23 2013 — this upcoming Saturday — all Americans be required to have a microchip implanted in some location (the back of the hand, the forearm and the back of the neck are popular body spots) so they can be tracked. This microchip will be, according to the paranoid Christian eschatologists among the bunch, a mark of the Beast imposed by the anti-Christ Barack Obama, a signal beginning the End Times and triggering the events of the apocalypse:

They’ll have to come up with a new conspiratorial prediction come March 24, but until then we can enjoy their twisted titters on Twitter. Back in January, I tracked Obama microchip Twitter posts for a few days and posted a semantic network that describes the most frequent verbal connections the conspiracy minded were making at the time. Words pair up if they appear nearby in the same Twitter posts. Excluding common connector words, the January 2013 Obama microchip verbal network appears below, with most-used terms in fiery red and least-used terms in deep blue:

January 2013 Obama RFID microchip Twitter network

I thought it might be time for an update, so I checked Twitter for posts on the subject in the past week (March 10 – March 16). As you’ll see below, the talk on the subject has simplified to encompass fewer verbal connections as the conspiracy promoters, sensing a bust, start to back away from the subject:

Conspiracy Updated: Network of Word Pairs Describing Linguistic Connections in Twitter Posts Predicting an Obamacare Microchip Apocalypse on March 23 2013

By March 24, 2013, the semantic network describing the Obama microchip apocalypse will likely be as empty as the set of claims propping up the hoax.

Last week, F.G. Fitzer debunked yet another conspiracy theory being spread about Barack Obama. According to rumors spreading in right-wing and libertarian circles, there is a provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) that will force Americans to have government-trackable rfid microchips implanted under their skin.

Even a few lower-quality newspapers have been used to help spread the hoax. The Chattanoogan, for instance, features the supposed text in the Obamacare law:

The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘(B)and is— ‘‘(i) a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”

And Patriot Update” declares that, because of this supposed text, “the Obama Health Care Bill will require all U.S. citizens and babies to receive a microchip or Medchip by March 23, 2013.”

That’s all utter nonsense, of course. As F.G. noted last week, a simple search of the text of the Obamacare law reveals that the supposed language just isn’t there. There’s nothing about medical device tracking in the law, there’s nothing about the date March 23, 2013 in the law, and the only tracking described by the law is a new complaint tracking system to make sure that patient complaints about poor care are followed up on and resolved to the patient’s satisfaction.

Regardless of the fact that the “Obamacare Microchip” conspiracy is a falsehood, a hoax, a confabulation and utter hogwash, it’s still useful to pay attention to such stories. The most important reason, of course, is to counter a false claim. But just as importantly, the shape of the forced-implantation story reveals something about the mental map of the people who find it so believable that they pass it on to their friends, neighbors and acquaintances in indignant, angry tones.

To try to sketch out what’s on the mind of those who spread the Obama microchip hoax, I’ve taken the text of all the Twitter posts (“Tweets”) in the last week that discuss the idea of the Obama Microchip. From this accumulated text, I’ve drawn out the network of all word pairs occurring at least twice (ignoring common structural words like “a,” “the,” “if,” “of,” “or,” “and,” and “but”). That network, with most-used terms in fiery red and least-used terms in deep blue, appears below:

The Language of Conspiracy: Network of Word Pairs used in Tweets spreading the Obama Microchip Conspiracy Hoax, January 21-28 2013

Immediately notable is the bilingual nature of this network; the rumor is being spread in non-English-speaking as well as English-speaking circles. The language of obligation, force, and requirement is heavy. Notions that a tracking microchip are part of a globalist conspiracy, and an idea that somehow a court is weighing in, add more layers to the story, layers that are believable enough to some to spread the story onward, as if it were true. Realists can be comforted by the occasional use of the webword “lol.” Better to laugh than to cry.

During the 2012 presidential election, News With Views, a web site that claims to be “where reality shatters illusion” claimed to have discovered that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known in Republican circles by the shorthand title Obamacare, will force all Americans to be injected with a trackable RFID microchip by March 23, this year. According to News With Views, this microchip, known as the Medchip, is authorized by the following language in the health care reform law:

satanic microchip"“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is a class III device; or ‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable."

It’s now less than two months before the supposed March 23, 2013 deadline for all Americans to get a government microchip implanted underneath their skin, and the rumors are running wild among birthers, truthers, preppers, and end timers. Are they right to be afraid?

Two things are key to evaluating this story:

1. The legislative language (shown above) that News With Views claims will require all Americans to accept an RFID chip in the next few weeks actually doesn’t say anything about creating a massive RFID implantation program. It would merely create a system for the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of certain medical devices, including implantable devices.

2. The legislative language isn’t actually in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Search the text of the law yourself. You won’t find any mention of a national medical device registry.

This story, like so many other right wing stories about satanic socialist plots that link Barack Obama to the beginning of an End Times war between the forces of evil and righteousness, is completely without basis in fact.

But then, I’m a liberal. Maybe I’m part of the conspiracy.

There’s one way to test that theory. Come back here on March 24, 2013. If everyone you know has had a government RFID chip forcefully implanted, let us know.

Ronald Reagan’s Eleventh Commandment, “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican,” appears to have been kicked out of the GOP canon.

Yesterday morning, FreedomWorks sent out a blast e-mail message to its followers entitled, “Protest Tea Party Poser Mitt Romney in New Hampshire” and reading in part:

FreedomWorks and tea party groups from around the region will be there. But not to hear platitudes from another establishment hack posing as an outsider.

We’ll be there to tell the real story about Mitt Romney, and to protest his record, which represents everything the tea party stands against.

After all, if we don’t hold candidates accountable for their actions while in office, who will? If we let ourselves be used as pawns to provide cover for the establishment, then what is the point of having the tea party?

We’re standing on principle, not politics. Will you join us?

FreedomWorks HQ: 1000 feet from the Russell Senate Office Building, 1500 feet from the U.S. Capitol.It’s a bit of an odd message, considering that FreedomWorks is part of the Republican “establishment.” FreedomWorks is a 501c3 corporation co-founded in 2004 by former Republican Majority Leader Dick Armey upon leaving office, with the cooperation of Republican congressman, cabinet member and Vice Presidential candidate Jack Kemp. With Dick Armey serving as Chair for the past seven years, FreedomWorks has funneled money into congressional campaigns, consistently favoring Republican candidates and consistently favoring a more conservative Republicanism. FreedomWorks’ offices are situated snugly inside the DC Beltway, just 1000 feet from the Russell Senate Office Building and just 1500 feet from the Capitol Building where the U.S. Congress convenes. If this is an outsider organization, I’m Fatty Arbuckle.

It’s also a bit odd for FreedomWorks to wag its finger about people being “used as pawns to provide cover for the establishment” considering the phone conversation I had today. I called up David Spielman, the Campaigns Coordinator at FreedomWorks and the person listed in FreedomWorks’ e-mail blast as point-man for the event. I was curious about the reasons for FreedomWorks’ plan to put on a protest in New Hampshire; the call to protest didn’t list any specific justifications for opposing Romney’s candidacy. When I asked Spielman what the particular policy reasons were for the protest against Romney, he briefly touched on a few: “He has a lot of issues that are no good. He does not have a good record… there’s mainly Obomneycare and Cap-and-Trade. Plus the fact that he has said nasty things about the Tea Party.”

But within a few seconds, Spielman got very specific, asking me to bring signs with particular messages written on them (I didn’t misrepresent myself, but Spielman seemed to assume I was a Tea Party activist). The messages Spielman identified were:

  • “I’m Tea Party. Romney Isn’t.”
  • “Obomneycare=Obama Care”
  • “ObamaCare = RomneyCare”
  • “Romney = RINO”

“We may or may not have a rhino suit,” Spielman added at the end of this list.

Look for these messages in coverage of the “Tea Party” event. Also look for a guy in a rhino suit. It’ll be hard to tell it from an elephant unless you take a very close look. Try taking a sniff under the tail.

Google Correlate is a new research tool used to find out where in the United States the entry of certain search terms is concentrated, and which search terms’ levels of popularity are correlated with one another across the 50 states. The first idea is pretty straightforward: where are people more or less likely to be entering a search term? In other words, where are the cultural ideas of America located? The second idea is less intuitive: which terms are searched for more often in the same sets of states, and less often in the same sets of states too? In other words, what ideas are culturally aligned in the same places?

For a little while now, I’ve been interested in the contentions (to use a charitable term), urban myths and legends (to use a descriptive term) and hoaxes (to use a judgmental term) surrounding President Barack Obama. Setting aside the content of his actual policies for a moment, his presidency has provoked a number of emotionally-charged reactions, each of which is centered around a story about the covert actions of President Obama or his alleged fellow travelers. These have spread widely around the internet and persist despite fact checking. I decided to use Google Correlate to answer two questions:

1. Is it possible to use information about geographic clustering to find new examples of urban legends and hoaxes I’ve never heard of before?
2. Are most of the major urban legends and hoaxes regarding Barack Obama prevalent in the same set of states, or are they divided somehow?

To answer these questions, I generated a snowball sample starting with a particular political hoax message and spreading out to include others. The hoax I started with is a popular but false claim that a bill called HB 1388 has just been passed and signed into law by Barack Obama to give Hamas 20 billion and collect Hamas militants for resettlement in communities of the United States. Messages spreading the untrue claim are now in their third year of making the rounds and show no signs of dying out. Using the Google Correlate service, I generated a list of other search terms which are popular in the same states that the search “HB 1388″ are popular (and which are unpopular in the same states that the search “HB 1388″ is unpopular), using a correlation of at least +0.85 as a cutoff for inclusion on the list. From that list I identified search terms associated with other political hoaxes and urban legends, and using those terms made new lists of search terms fitting similar geographic profiles. I continued the process until there were no new hoaxes or urban legends listed, generating a set of 11 hoaxes and urban legends.

The following sociogram shows which hoax/urban legend search terms were generated from the snowball sample starting with “HB 1388,” and which pairs of terms are strongly correlated in search strength on a state-by-state basis:

Geographic Connections between Urban Myths in Politics: state-by-state correlation of various search terms identified through a snowball sample beginning with "HB 1388," completed June 18 2011

The included terms are:

  • “hb 1388,” the starting point of the snowball sample
  • “Judge David Carter,” referring to the false claim that the federal district court judge had required Barack Obama to produce evidence of his citizenship. Judge Carter actually dismissed the lawsuit making that demand.
  • “americans for freedom of information,” referring to a fake AP article purporting to announce the release of proof that Barack Obama is really named “Barry Soetoro” and applied for admission to Occidental College as an Indonesian citizen.
  • “a license required for your home,” referring to the false claim that cap-and-trade legislation would require homeowners to gain a license showing compliance with energy standards before they could sell their home. Calling it a “Surprise from Obama” is a nice touch, considering that the story’s about a congressional bill and Barack Obama is President, not a legislator. Besides, the cap and trade approach was developed through a collaboration of conservative economists and Republicans. On top of all that, cap-and-trade legislation hasn’t been passed and has been dropped from the congressional agenda.
  • “Obama trial,” referring to a 2010 event held by a conservative pastor at his church during which about 75 got together, had lunch, “ruled” that President Obama was guilty of not being a citizen of the United States, then forwarded the ruling to legal authorities for enforcement. Despite the pastor’s assertion that his event had force of law because the police didn’t shut it down, it was just a show.
  • “Dr. Sam Vaknin,” referring to a chain e-mail signed “Dr. Sam Vaknin” asserting that Barack Obama is a narcissist. A fact check reveals that Vaknin is not a mental health professional, got his PhD from a diploma mill, and at any rate did not write the article. This doesn’t mean that Barack Obama isn’t a narcissist, but it does mean that the article is a hoax.
  • “flight 297 atlanta to houston,” referring to a story the author now admits is fabricated in which 11 Muslim men in “full attire” boarded an airplane in a terrorist dry run, acted shifty, refused to follow the rules, screamed “shut up infidel dog!” at a flight attendant and would have gotten away with it too if it weren’t for a pair of stalwart Texans who stood up to the Muslims (and ineffectual Homeland Security agents), rallied the passengers and the crew, and refused to go along with the terrorist plot.
  • “General Bill Ginn,” a search term referring to an urban legend that… get this… Barack Obama, being interviewed by General Bill Ginn on Meet the Press, explained why he doesn’t wear a flag lapel pin: “I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides…. And the anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all…. I like the song ‘I’d like to Teach the World to Sing.’ If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.” It’s a silly quote, it’s a ridiculous notion that generals interview politicians on Meet the Press, and it’s utter hogwash.
  • “fema concentration camps,” an entry showing that an urban legend can have basis in fact. As H.R. 645 in the House and S. 3476 in the Senate, a bill called the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act proposed to the 111th Congress that “the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations” for humanitarian purposes but also, disturbingly, “to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.” It should be noted, however, that neither H.R. 645 nor S. 3476 were passed out of committee, much less passed by the Congress or signed into law in the 111th Congress. The National Emergency Centers Establishment Act has not even been introduced before the 112th Congress.
  • “muslim stamp,” referring to the incorrect claim that Barack Obama ordered the Postal Service to start issuing stamps for the Muslim holiday of Eid.
  • “dhimmitude,” referring to the not altogether incorrect notion that some Muslims may gain an exemption from requirements to gain health care coverage… which is part of a general exemption in recently passed health care reform legislation (so-called “ObamaCare”) for people opposed to participation in insurance on religious grounds

Was Google Correlate a good way to find out about hoaxes and urban legends related to Barack Obama? Definitely. Of the 11 Obama hoaxes or urban legends Google Correlate pointed me to, I’d never heard a word about 8.

Are the Obama hoaxes and urban legends popular in similar sets of states? The set of 11 identified here appear to be. Between these 11 hoaxes and urban legends there are 55 relationships, 55 opportunities for a correlation of at least +0.85 between the two to appear. In 32 out of the 55 pairs, a correlation this strong did appear. In 8 out of the 55 pairs, the correlation reached a level of at least +0.90. What are these states? You can find out for yourself by Google Correlate query, or you can take my word for it: they’re the same states whose electoral votes went to John McCain in the 2008 election.

But the appearance of this dense cultural web of hoaxes and myths, all concentrated in the McCain states, is at least partially rigged, an product of the snowball sample itself. After all, the hoaxes and myths were found because searches for them across the 50 states occurred with a pattern highly correlated to the pattern of “HB 1388″ searches; it shouldn’t be too surprising that the geographic pattern of the hoaxes and myths are correlated with one another, too.

The bigger question is, are there hoaxes and urban legends surrounding Barack Obama that weren’t dredged up by Google Correlate, ones that aren’t popular or unpopular in the same sets of states? One urban legend is conspicuous in its absence: the claim that Barack Obama is somehow secretly a Muslim. The geographic distribution of that claim isn’t strongly correlated with searches for “HB 1388″ or any of the other 10 hoaxes described above. Google searches asking “is Obama a Muslim” are concentrated in the Bible Belt, and are correlated with a different series of myths and legends that are religious in theme: false claims that Barack Obama had canceled the National Day of Prayer, questions regarding Obama’s identity as the Anti-Christ, searches for signs of The End and people looking for descriptions of dinosaurs in the Bible. As the sociogram below shows, these are correlated with one another to a significant extent; none of them are strongly correlated with searches for “HB 1388″:

Sociogram showing geographic connections between religious myths in politics, as generated through Google Correlate, all with a correlation of at least +0.90

Are there other hoaxes, urban legends or myths regarding Barack Obama that you know of but that don’t appear on either of these two lists, that could be associated with another geographic cluster of anti-Obama culture?