Some things change with the passage of time, but much remains the same.

Seven years ago today, President George W. Bush spoke before a national Boy Scout Jamboree, praising its practice of kicking out Boy Scouts when it finds out they are gay or don’t believe in God. This week, eagle scouts from across the country returned their medals to the Boy Scouts of America after the organization reaffirmed its discriminatory practices.

Seven years ago today, oil industry officials blamed a rise in oil prices on the death of Saudi Arabia’s King Fahd while on the way to record profits they happily accepted new subsidies from the federal government. Last month, the Energy Information Administration released data showing that the latest spike in oil prices wasn’t coming from too little oil production — it was coming from increased consumption.

Five years ago today, the pastor of the Walnut Creek Community Church in Windsor Heights, Iowa admitted that he had explicitly used his tax-exempt perch to campaign for the election of Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee. This is a violation of the promise to stay out of politics that the Walnut Creek Community Church made when it voluntarily sought to avoid paying taxes. Last month, Nathan Cherry announced that in October, churches across the country will break the promises they made when applying for the privilege of not paying taxes. These churches while continuing to refuse paying taxes, will issue a wave of church-based political endorsements just before Election Day.

Five years ago today, the Walnut Creek Community Church held on tight to national political attention, declaring that good Protestant Christians could not possibly vote for Sam Brownback because Brownback was Catholic. Last month, the hosts of the national Wallbuilders Live! radio program declared that not voting for Mitt Romney would be a sin.

Three years ago today, Democratic Representative Dennis Kucinich attended a rally with Green Party representatives to oppose Democratic Party foot-dragging on universal health care, leading to speculation that Kucinich might run for President in 2012 as a Green. Today, Dennis Kucinich is off the presidential campaign scene and is preparing to leave the Congress. But the Green Party has gained ballot access in three more states over the past week, laying the groundwork for Jill Stein’s Green presidential bid.

Three years ago today, Congress passed an appropriations measure that expanded the military budget to a full 58 percent of discretionary spending. Today, Republican senators are heading out on a four-state tour, campaigning to protect the military budget from a “$500 billion cut.” But it’s not a “$500 billion cut” to the military budget that’s being proposed — the $500 billion sum is spread across ten annual military budgets. For the annual military budget, there’s only a $50 billion sum being considered. Besides, the $50 billion spending reduction isn’t actually a cut — it’s a reduction in the rate of growth of the military budget. The reality of military spending three years ago and today is that the United States spends more on its military than the next 10 biggest military spenders — China, Russia, the UK, France, Japan, Germany, Italy, Saudi Arabia, South Korea and India — combined.

A glimpse at Saddleback Church, an ultra-wealthy establishment situated on prime California real estate with multiple amenities and state-of-the-art technologyWhen conservative preacher Rick Warren raked in $2.4 million last December for his “Saddleback Church” (an archipelago of high-tech churches, gymnasium courts, restaurants and even a music school sitting on nine campuses of prime California real estate), the church didn’t pay a penny of tax on that income. Saddleback Church is tax-exempt despite its wealth.

Most years, about a third of Americans have an income too low to pay income tax (they do pay sales taxes, gas taxes, payroll taxes, state and local taxes, and so on…). But lately, more Americans are losing their jobs and sinking deep into poverty. When Rick Warren found out that half of Americans now are so poor that their income doesn’t meet the low minimum threshold for income tax, he vented his all-caps rage on Twitter. His rage wasn’t directed at the misfortune of poverty. No, preacher Warren directed his ire at those nervy jobless poor people who don’t pay income taxes:

Rick Warren on Taxes, the night of July 25-26 2011: HALF of America pays No taxes.  Zero.  So they're happy for tax rates to be raised on the other half that DOES pay taxes.

100% of American churches pay no taxes. 100%. And Rick Warren’s church is the 8th largest church in America.

Within a few hours, someone pointed out to Warren that with his church’s untaxed millions and all, dumping on poor Americans might not look so good, and he deleted his tweet. But thanks to Karoli‘s screen capture, the expression is recorded. Another legacy by which Rick Warren’s sentiment lives on: retweets of the expression over and over again by his followers.

In New York State, a strong majority of citizens support the legal recognition of the equality of heterosexual and homosexual marriages. A bipartisan coalition of Democrats and Republicans just came together to approve state legislation granting full legal status to same-sex marriages in New York State.

The people of New York State have spoken clearly on the issue of marriage equality. A political interest group from out of state, however, is now planning to use money to overturn the will of the people.

Brian Brown, President of the National Organization for Marriage, has made a “pledge to commit at least $2 million” to spend in 2012 New York elections in order to defeat legislators who voted in favor of marriage rights for all. The National Organization for Marriage isn’t a New York group, though. It’s headquartered in Washington D.C., in an office building less than a quarter mile from the White House.

Where will these millions of dollars to interfere in New York elections come from? They’ll be subsidized by the federal government. The National Organization for Marriage is a tax exempt organization.

The National Organization for Marriage refuses to say exactly who its donors are, but an activist group called NOM Exposed details contributions from Mormon organizations, evangelical Christians, and Catholic groups such as the Knights of Columbus and Opus Dei. These organizations claim tax exempt status as well.

“If the cost of a movement based on persuasion rather than coercion is occasional freelance action, by impetuous followers, the larger benefit is a movement that distributes initiative to its farthest outpost. Movements that expect people to take the personal risks inherent in nonviolent action have no alternative; they have to become what they want their country to become: open in form and democratic in function.”

– Americans Elect President, Chairman and Director Peter Ackerman, in A Force More Powerful


They Never Write, They Never Call

Over the past six months, I’ve made repeated efforts to reach out to the nascent 501c4 corporation/political party Americans Elect, establish contact and learn to see things from their point of view. I’ve made phone calls. I’ve sent e-mails. I’ve sent certified letters in the mail. I’ve asked simple questions. I’ve done all these things all at nicely spaced intervals so as to not give them a harried feeling. I have yet to receive a response.

Americans Elect has been engaging in outreach and sharing information, mind you, but only to limited audiences of powerful and well-connected people. Last fall, Peter Ackerman distributed literature regarding Americans Elect and solicited communication from attendees at a gala dinner charging up to $50,000 a plate. Americans Elect also held an exclusive, invitation-only event in Aspen last summer at which it distributed literature to those in attendance. With the well-connected and well-heeled, Americans Elect has maintained lines of communication. It’s with the little people like you and me that Americans Elect isn’t communicating.

The Latest Episode: No Response on Legally-Required Information

My latest attempt to make contact with Americans Elect and see their side of the story was earlier this month, when I e-mailed Americans Elect to let them know I’d be in town March 11 and would like to pop into their office at 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue to say hello. That message hit a stone wall, so I sent a second message informing them that I’d be dropping by their office that day to review their IRS documentation. You see, the federal government requires corporations organized under section 501(c) of the IRS code to make the following forms available the same day upon an in-person request, and within 30 days upon a written request:

* Form 990, the organization’s annual report to the IRS
* Form 1023/1024, the organization’s application for tax-exempt status
* Any letter or other documentation accompanying the organization’s application for tax-exempt status

Now, Americans Elect may not yet have a Form 990 to share with those who make a request, but it has been acting as a 501(c)4 corporation for six months now and therefore should have made an application for tax-exempt status; these are documents that Americans Elect is required to let anybody see. Americans Elect was organized before that as a political organization under Section 527, creating another set of documents that it is also required to produce.

Here’s a picture I took of the lobby of 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue, covered in exquisite marble. Americans Elect occupies Suite 1212, located on the building’s prime top floor:

The marble-covered lobby of 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue.  Americans Elect headquarters occupies a top-floor suite in this prime real estate location, just one block away from the White House

The Exterior of 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC.  Americans Elect occupies the 12th floor.That picture was taken on my way out, after a security guard informed me that under no circumstances would I be allowed to visit the Americans Elect offices. I explained that the purpose of this visit was to review IRS documents that Americans Elect is required to make publicly available upon request; the guard told me that didn’t matter. I explained to the guard that I’d let Americans Elect know I’d be coming to look at these documents. The guard was aware of this, I was told, and had been specifically instructed by Americans Elect that day not to let anyone up who wasn’t on the approved list. I wasn’t on the list of the approved.

In a neat trick that only the wealthy and powerful can manage, it turns out that Americans Elect does not have to follow federal mandates to provide IRS documentation upon an in-person request if it can prevent people like you and me from presenting Americans Elect with the in-person request. I was reduced to standing on the street corner outside Americans Elect’s luxury office building and sending my in-person request for documentation via a wi-fi connection. I offered to make myself available to receive those documents within 5 minutes during any period of the six hours left to the March 11 workday. Americans Elect never responded to my request. Should Americans Elect interpret my request for documents as a written rather than in-person request (e-mails count), it has until April 10 to provide those documents to me. What do you think is going to happen?

Conclusion
Americans Elect strikes a populist tone as it readies itself for a public launch. But while it communicates with the wealthy and powerful, it stonewalls requests for communication from everyday Americans like you and me.

As an author of a book he says is the model for Americans Elect, President and Chairman Peter Ackerman insists that such efforts must be open, even and especially to the little folk who might prove a distraction. That’s the price of democracy, Ackerman writes. To this point, the reality of Americans Elect doesn’t match the standards of its leadership. If Americans Elect will not communicate with us, the most that we can do is stand on the sidelines and hope for change.

The content of the October 2005 sermons of Thomas Muthee in Wasilla has been disclosed, and it appears that Muthee’s sermons on behalf of the Wasilla Assemblies of God have violated the law.

The Internal Revenue Service makes the law very clear: those churches that don’t want to pay taxes on their income must in exchange agree not to use the church to promote the election of any political candidate:

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

Thomas MutheeThomas Muthee electioneering on behalf of Sarah Palin on October 11, 2005 at the Wasilla Assemblies of God church in Alaska made the following exhortation in a sermon to the Wasilla Assemblies of God on October 11, 2005 (transcribed from the video source):

There are people who are wired to politics because God wants to take the political, you know, dimension of our societies. And those people should be prayed for. That’s why I was, you know, I was so glad to see Sarah here. We should pray for her, we should back her up. And, you know, come the day of voting, we should be there, not just praying, we should be there. And I’m saying this because that’s what I’m telling our church. I’m telling them that we need this in Parliament. In here is what you call Congressmen, you know, you know, the, the Governors, we need the bretheren right inside there. Is anybody hearing me?

Do you hear what’s going on in the Wasilla Assemblies of God with Sarah Palin right there in the audience? I hear a sermon telling congregants to vote for Sarah Palin. So long as the Wasilla Assemblies of God is willing to pay tax on its considerable income just like I do, that would be fine. But Wasilla has embraced its special tax-free status, and as part of the deal by law it can’t electioneer. It’s electioneered.

It appears to me that the Wasilla Assemblies of God has violated the law on behalf of Sarah Palin.

We need to take the following actions:

1. Spread the word. Send this transcript to your friends, post it on your blog, let your local paper know about it.

2. Complain to the IRS. Write a letter to the following address asking the IRS to investigate:

Mr. Steven T. Miller
Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities
Internal Revenue Service
1111 Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20224

Send it today, priority mail. In the letter, be sure to include the text of Thomas Muthee’s remarks, the date of Muthee’s sermon and links to the video in which Muthee can be seen to be uttering the remarks. Be polite, but be sure to explicitly ask the IRS to investigate this apparent violation.

3. Ask Sarah Palin what she thinks of Muthee’s behavior. Sarah Palin was there that day. As you can see in the video, she was even called up given God’s blessing through Muthee in her run for Governor of Alaska. This means she’s aware of what Muthee did on her behalf. If she is at all ready to be President of the United States of America, as she claims, then she must surely be aware of the legal prohibition on church electioneering.

Sarah Palin owes Americans an explanation. If she’s coming to your neck of the woods, ask her for one. If she isn’t, then

4. Write a letter to your local newspaper asking her for one.

There you go. Four things you can do in the service of church-state separation and in defense of the rule of law in the United States of America. Get to it!

Barack Obama announced today that he intends to expand George W. Bush’s unconstitutional program of so-called “faith-based” initiatives. These programs are religious – that’s what the phrase “faith-based” means.

So, let’s get down to brass tacks: Barack Obama intends to set up a system of government funding for religious programs, and one that’s even bigger than what George W. Bush has established. The purpose of this system is to channel government money to religious organizations, so that the religious organizations can perform the functions that the government had previously been performing. The government of We The People gets replaced by the churches of They The Preachers – yet We The People still get stuck with the bill.

(Hear more on the associated podcast about the new faith-based Obama scheme)

If the government’s paying for these programs, they’re established by the government, even if they’re administered by the religious groups. So, Barack Obama wants to use government money to establish religious programs.

Let’s go back to the First Amendment, shall we? It states that there shall be no government establishment of religion: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”. All federal money comes through Congress. So, what Barack Obama is proposing is that Congress make law that provides the President with the money to give to religious programs (or, Obama is proposing to completely ignore the First Amendment ban on what money from Congress can be used for).

Obama’s campaign claims this all is just a big misunderstanding. They say that the programs that will get money under Barack Obama’s plans will all be secular. Think about that for a second, and you’ll see how absurd that claim is: Secular faith-based initiatives?!? Really? If the programs are all going to be secular, then why are they being called “faith-based” – when “faith-based” means religious?

These excuses don’t fly. There’s a reason that Barack Obama calls these programs “faith-based”, and it’s the same reason that George W. Bush called his programs “faith-based”. It has to do with campaign politics.

kickbacks in government established religious programsBarack Obama wants to get elected President. From the start, Obama has been using churches as de-facto campaign organizations. He’s campaigned in churches, and he’s had churches campaign on his behalf. He’s even had gospel tours for his campaign with church leaders taking part. This is illegal and unconstitutional, but Barack Obama seems to care more about getting elected than he does about the law and the Constitution.

Barack Obama’s announcement that he plans to use the power of government to shovel huge amounts of money into the bank accounts of big, powerful churches is nothing more than an attempt to buy more churches to use as campaign organizations to help Obama get elected.

Faith-based, nothing. These initiatives are kickback-based.

This is the main reason that Obama’s government-funded religious programs are unconstitutional and illegal: They are designed to persuade tax-exempt religious organizations to engage in political campaigning for one particular candidate.

These programs are corrupt. They corrupt the government by setting government policy with the purpose of political allegiance. They corrupt churches by encouraging church leaders to campaign for the candidate who promises to write the biggest government handout check back to the church after Inauguration Day.

If Barack Obama were truly progressive, and if he truly cared about the Constitution, he would end George W. Bush’s government-funded religious programs, not expand them.

It’s a matter of law: non-profit organizations, including churches, must refrain “from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office” so long as they wish to be exempt from taxation for the large number of government services they receive.

Just because it’s against the law and the ethical standards of their own voluntary agreements with the government doesn’t mean that churches won’t go ahead and do it anyway. Far too often, churches want to have their cake (government services without having to pay taxes) and eat it too (interfering in political campaigns).

If and when you have evidence of a church violating the law and the standards of its own voluntary tax-exempt agreement with the IRS, there are two places you can report the violation.

1. Tell the IRS. Use Form 13909 to report any non-profit organization’s violation of its agreement with the government. The form allows you to make an anonymous report if you wish, and it also allows you to indicate that “I am concerned that I might face retaliation or retribution if my identity is disclosed.” Any relevant documentation of the violation can be included along with the form. As the form itself indicates, “The completed form, along with any supporting documentation, may be mailed to IRS EO Classification, Mail Code 4910DAL, 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, TX 75242-1198, faxed to 214-413-5415 or emailed to eoclass@irs.gov.”

2. Tell Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. The organization (AU for short) has set up a dedicated website called Project Fair Play with a set of guidelines on politics for churches and other non-profit organizations and an online form through which you can report violations of the prohibition on church politicking. A team of researchers and legal experts employed by AU will look into your report. The advantage here is that with their resources, expertise and dedicated time they may be able to assemble a better case to the IRS than you could on your own.

The IRS makes it very clear: Under law, if churches choose (like any other non-profit organization) to file for tax-exempt status, then exchange for tax-exempt status they must agree to these terms:

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all IRC section 501(c)(3) organizations, including churches and religious organizations, are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise tax.

Churches have a great deal going under the current system. They gather huge amounts of income and hold gigantic amounts of wealth in this country. Despite all that income and wealth, churches don’t have to pay a single penny of income tax. Even though churches benefit from roads, utility provision, police protection, investment insurance and countless other varieties of government provision, they don’t have to pay a single penny of income tax. What a deal! All that a church has to do to get this amazing giveaway of government services without paying a penny of taxes is to agree not to interfere in government elections. It’s a completely voluntary arrangement — if a church wants to interfere in elections, then all it has to do is give up its tax-exempt status and start paying income taxes… just like you and I have to do when we get income. Under IRS rules, any church caught interfering in a political campaign is subject to the revocation of its tax-exempt status.

It’s time for the Jonesville Church of God to lose its tax-exempt status. Pastor Roger Byrd put this campaign message on the church sign for all in Jonesville, South Carolina to see:

Obama Osama Humm Are They Brothers Sign at Jonesville Church of God in South Carolina

Since this came to public attention, Byrd has been trying to backpedal on the big “Obama, Osama. Humm. Are They Brothers?” church sign:

It’s simply to cause people to realize and to see what possibly could happen if we were to get someone in there that does not believe in Jesus Christ…. I don’t know. See it asks a question: Are they brothers? In other words, is he Muslim? I don’t know. He says he’s not. I hope he’s not. But I don’t know. And it’s just something to try to stir people’s minds.

Suuuure. Byrd doesn’t know if Barack Obama and Osama bin Laden are brothers. Riiiiight. Byrd doesn’t know if Barack Obama is Muslim. Uh huh… well, no, actually not. Actually, what Byrd is saying is bullshit, and Roger Byrd knows it.

It’s not just Pastor Roger Byrd who has stepped over the line of tax laws by turning his church into an anti-Obama campaign organization. Confronted with the church’s violation of the law, Byrd brought the issue up for a vote, in which the whole congregation reiterated its determination to use church resources to campaign against Barack Obama.

This church wants to keep taking services from the government, keep refraining from paying taxes, and then keep interfering in elections. It’s brazenly unethical and illegal activity, and it’s time for the IRS to intervene and revoke the Jonesville Church of God’s tax-exempt status.