This year, my daughter’s third-grade class was asked to bring in parents to share family holiday traditions. One of the things my extended family has enjoyed doing over the past four years is singing this “Here Comes Krampus” song when we get together between the solstice and the new year. And so with posterboard in hand I told the third grade class about Krampus, the Alpine trickster spirit who accompanies punishes naughty children by swatting them with birch switches, putting them in his sack and tossing them in a cold stream.

A Christmas Krampus

We started out with the familiar. I asked the children if they thought Santa Claus was a good guy or a bad guy — the unanimous, enthusiastic answer was “good guy.” Then we sang “Santa Claus is Coming to Town” and looked at the lyrics; there’s a kind of creepy side to this Santa involving surveillance and punishment. And that was the point at which I brought in Krampus, who in Europe accompanies St. Nicholas and doles out punishment. To convince the children that I wasn’t making it up, and to talk about Krampus in terms of tradition, I showed them this video of Krampus and accompanying Buttnmandl dressed in straw from Berchtesgaden, Germany:

Krampus and the Buttnmandl are part of a larger mumming tradition that is older than the St. Nick story and that stretches more broadly from the British Isles to Bulgaria. Dimo Dimov connects Krampus to mummery. At the summer solstice and the winter solstice, mummers mark the change from darkness to light, from chill to warm. Dimov writes, “The special marks of the mummers are huge bells, wooden and leather animal, demon and spirit masks, natural materials and clothes like wool, wood, cones, moss and roots. Spreading fright and blessings is the main theme of those creatures, who are an important part of the rural landscape.”

“I know another name for him,” said one of the children, raising her hand. “He’s the devil, isn’t he?” I replied, “Well, he has horns like the devil, doesn’t he? But not everything that has horns is a devil.” The more subtle answer I didn’t give is that Europe has been a religious battleground between Christianity and older pagan traditions. What better way to push away mythic competition than to take pre-existing figures and brand then as “devils?” Indeed, as this web page from Salzburg notes, the Krampus tradition was banned outright by the Catholic Church during the Inquisition. But the tradition has survived in Europe and is spreading again beyond its original borders.

Full credit to my daughter’s teacher, who not only tolerated but welcomed sharing a tradition about this “devil” in her classroom. We ended by singing the chorus of the Krampus song: “Here comes Krampus, here comes Krampus, ja, ja, ja, ja, ja!”

Racist Republicans Throw Nuts

August 29th, 2012 | Posted by Truman in Republicans - (2 Comments)

Republicans say that they’re the political party that stands for “traditional values” – but what does that phrase mean? A clue was provided by the behavior of Republicans in attendance at their national convention in Tampa yesterday. The Republicans threw peanuts at an African-American journalist, and hollered “This is how we feed the animals!”

There is indeed a long tradition in this country of treating African-Americans like animals. It’s a tradition rooted in slavery.

The Republican National Convention of 2012 is serving as a reminder that, often, traditional values are downright ugly.

An Old Fashioned Christmas

December 22nd, 2009 | Posted by Rowan in Religion - (0 Comments)

“Let’s bring back an old-fashioned Christmas”, reads the headline from the Desert Valley Times newspaper editorial this morning.

Still, I’m left wanting specifics. Which kind of “old-fashioned Christmas” is the writer talking about?

The kind of old-fashioned Christmas that was marked with drunken brawls in the streets?

The kind of old-fashioned Christmas that was mostly ignored?

Oh, no. The writer rejects those old-fashioned Christmas traditions, and instead goes for the current day Christmas practice of insisting that no one celebrate any other holiday but Christmas, even if they’re not Christians.

That’s not old-fashioned. It’s just mean.

Why is Rick Warren seeking to change the definition of marriage?

Unitarian Universalists have included same-sex marriage within their religious rituals for years now. That’s a genuine American religious tradition that understands the definition of marriage to include unions between men and men, women and women and men and women. Why is Rick Warren using his political influence to try to get the government to interfere with the free exercise of this religious tradition…

…and why, for goodness sakes, is Barack Obama helping Warren do it?

It doesn’t take a monkey to ask these questions, but if it helps, here you are:

Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed H. CON. RES. 350 – a resolution declaring congressional opposition to all forms of whaling, and urging the International Whaling Commission to work to end all whaling, even whaling that purports to be for scientific purposes. The resolution had been introduced to Congress on May 14th, not very long ago by the standards of Capitol Hill.

Also included in the measure is the expression of opposition to “community-based whaling”. That’s an interesting development, as many people generally opposed to whaling have allowed for an exception to traditions of small-scale whaling in coastal communities. This loophole for the sake of tradition has been abused – by Norway, for example, which has claimed to have a tradition of hunting for minke whales, although Norway only began hunting for minke whales in the 1930s.

What about the genuine traditional whale hunters? Are they to be cut off from their food supply? No, not with the vision of yesterday’s congressional resolution. The measure prods the IWC to

“…oppose any initiative that would result in any new, Commission-sanctioned coastal or community-based whale hunting, even if it is portrayed as noncommercial, including any commercial whaling by any coastal communities that does not qualify as aboriginal subsistence whaling”

This resolution still provides an exception for aboriginal subsistence whaling, which would exclude tradition for the sake of tradition, or whale hunting community rituals, but allow those who truly depend upon whale meat for survival to continue their ways, if they are native to the place where they live. That’s a pretty small niche.

As a resolution, this congressional measure does not carry the force of law. It’s just a political statement. Besides, the U.S. Congress does not have control over the International Whaling Commission – just influence. Exercising that influence through a statement like this is useful to some extent, but it won’t change anything on its own.

What’s interesting to me is where this resolution comes from – West Virginia. It was West Virginia representative Nick Rahall who introduced the measure. Close your eyes and picture a map of the USA, and you’ll have a difficult time finding any West Virginia coastal communities with ties to the whaling industry.

That Congressman Rahall found it important enough to introduce a resolution against whaling and see it through to approval suggests that the appeal of whales isn’t related to any concrete connection to the oceans. That indicates a potential for ocean conservation activism that spans the entire country, regardless of physical proximity to the sea. As citizens of a nation as politically powerful and economically weighty as the USA, need to be able to consider larger issues in this way. Politics can no longer all be local, given that our power to impact the world is far beyond the local scale as well.