<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Irregular Times &#187; Podcasts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/feed/?category_name=podcasts" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://irregulartimes.com</link>
	<description>In a time when old landmarks crumble, established roads no longer lead the way, but new paths of progress open to those travelers who have an irregular eye. We publish all the news unfit for print.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:29:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Against the Blue Dog Democrat Howling</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/12/17/against-the-blue-dog-democrat-howling/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/12/17/against-the-blue-dog-democrat-howling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bart gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betsy markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john tanner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=16278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video Podcast: Along comes U.S. Representative Betsy Markey this week, announcing that she's <i>joining</i> the Blue Dog Coalition.  Her political perception is so out of focus that she doesn't realize she's jumping onto a sinking ship.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blue Dog Democrats make me shake my head and wonder.  Don&#8217;t they know that the reason that the Democrats won control of the White House, and tightened control over both houses of Congress, is that they promised <i>progressive change</i>?  </p>
<p>Apparently not.  Those <a href="http://www.squidoo.com/blue-dog-democrats">Blue Dogs</a> just keep on voting with the Republicans, helping the GOP block the very legislation, like health care reform and a bill to confront climate change, that brought the Democrats electoral success in 2008.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no wonder that Blue Dog Coalition members like <a href="http://thatsmycongress.com/house/repGordonTN6111.html">Bart Gordon</a> and <a href="http://thatsmycongress.com/house/repTannerTN8111.html">John Tanner</a> are having to drop out of their re-election campaigns.  They can&#8217;t convince Democrats to donate to their campaigns any more, because they&#8217;ve been running with the Republicans for so long.</p>
<p>Yet, along comes U.S. Representative <a href="http://thatsmycongress.com/house/repMarkeyCO4111.html">Betsy Markey</a> this week, announcing that she&#8217;s <i>joining</i> the Blue Dog Coalition.  Her political perception is so out of focus that she doesn&#8217;t realize she&#8217;s jumping onto a sinking ship.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for progressives to <a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/bluedoghowl.mov">howl against the Blue Dogs</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/bluedoghowl.mov"><img src="http://www.irregulartimes.com/bluedoghowl.jpg" alt="blue dog democrat" border="0"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/12/17/against-the-blue-dog-democrat-howling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/bluedoghowl.mov" length="10401497" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irregular Week In Review Podcast Sept 27 &#8211; Oct 3</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/05/irregular-week-in-review-podcast-sept-27-oct-3/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/05/irregular-week-in-review-podcast-sept-27-oct-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 13:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c-17]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this Irregular Week in Review podcast: Senate Democrats behaving badly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the week in review podcasts out there are broadcast on Friday, just when people are getting ready to tune out for a relaxing weekend, and to forget about what&#8217;s just taken place.  I&#8217;m creating this podcast instead on a Monday, because I believe that people ought to actually <i>use</i> the news to inform their active citizenship, speaking back to power.</p>
<p>In <b><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/irregularweekreviewoct309.mp3">this podcast</a></b>: Senate Democrats behaving badly, on <a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/c-17spendingrollcall.html">C-17 military waste</a>, <a href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/29/democrats-join-republicans-to-defeat-health-care-reform/">health care reform</a> and <a href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/02/senate-democrats-join-republicans-to-kill-protection-from-government-spies/">government spying against Americans</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/05/irregular-week-in-review-podcast-sept-27-oct-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/irregularweekreviewoct309.mp3" length="12051571" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Did Blanche Lincoln Vote Against the Public Option?</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/30/why-did-blanche-lincoln-vote-against-the-public-option/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/30/why-did-blanche-lincoln-vote-against-the-public-option/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blanche lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did Arkansas Senator Blanche Lincoln vote to kill Barack Obama's health care reform centerpiece, the public option?  The answer has a lot to do with her sources of campaign finance reform.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator <a href="http://thatsmycongress.com/senate/senatorBlancheLincolnAR111.html">Blanche Lincoln</a> is running for re-election next year as a Democrat.  The Democrats have been campaigning for years on the promise of universal health care, or at least health care reform that would make medical insurance affordable for all Americans.  The public option is a widely popular way to expand health care coverage.  Given that, <a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/blanchelincolnhealth1.mov">why did Senator Lincoln use her vote in the senate to kill the public option in the Senate&#8217;s health care reform legislation?</a></p>
<p>Look at where Lincoln is getting the money for her 2010 re-election campaign if you want to find the answer.  She has raised <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00008092&#038;cycle=2010">over 4 million dollars for her campaign</a> so far, and most of it comes from political action committees and funneled corporate money.  A great deal of that money comes from organizations and individuals who profit from the health care status quo.  </p>
<p>Of all U.S. Senators, Blanche Lincoln is the top recipient of donations from companies that manufacture and sell medical supplies.  Lincoln also takes a great deal of money directly from political action groups set up by insurance companies.  These are the sources of the money she&#8217;s using to run for re-election &#8211; so it makes sense, in a cynical kind of way, that these are the interests she is protecting by voting against Barack Obama&#8217;s public option.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/blanchelincolnhealth1.mov"><img src="http://www.irregulartimes.com/blanchelincolnhealth1.jpg" alt="blanche lincoln health care reform video podcast"/></a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/30/why-did-blanche-lincoln-vote-against-the-public-option/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/blanchelincolnhealth1.mov" length="5564033" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Afghanistan Mission Shows War A Poor Tool For Change</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/17/afghanistan-mission-shows-war-a-poor-tool-for-change/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/17/afghanistan-mission-shows-war-a-poor-tool-for-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War and Peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osama bin laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For all the reasons that we were told that going to war in Afghanistan would be a good idea, war has been an ineffective tool, in fact.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taliban resurgent.<br />
Osama Bin Laden and Al Quaeda safe.<br />
Opium production growing.<br />
Theocratic Muslim government in place.<br />
And now, <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/Afghanistan/article6836616.ece">election fraud even more massive than what we suspected before</a>.</p>
<p>War doesn&#8217;t seem to have been an effective tool in Afghanistan after all.</p>
<p><a href="Http://www.irregulartimes.com/stanafghan.mov"><img src="Http://www.irregulartimes.com/stanafghan.jpg" alt="afghanistan cartoon" border="0"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/17/afghanistan-mission-shows-war-a-poor-tool-for-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BaucusCare Video Podcast By an Angry Toad</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/16/baucuscare-video-podcast-by-an-angry-toad/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/16/baucuscare-video-podcast-by-an-angry-toad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baucuscare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=14201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BaucusCare doesn't even include the public option which would provide an alternative to private medical insurance and pressure insurance companies to stop abusing sick and injured Americans when they're at their most vulnerable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Senator <a href="http://thatsmycongress.com/senate/senatorMaxBaucusMT111.html">Max Baucus</a> announced his health care reform proposal.  Given the position Baucus has as chair of the Senate Finance Committee, I suppose we shouldn&#8217;t have expected any better.  The legislation he has crafted serves the needs of finance very well, but it doesn&#8217;t actually help much with health care.</p>
<p>The BaucusCare legislation slashes the subsidies to help Americans pay for health care insurance that were provided in other reform proposals.  Finance saves money, and working Americans are going to have to pick up the bill.  </p>
<p>BaucusCare neglects the single payer health care strategy that could provide good health insurance to Americans at a significantly reduced cost.  BaucusCare doesn&#8217;t even include the public option which would provide an alternative to private medical insurance and pressure insurance companies to stop abusing sick and injured Americans when they&#8217;re at their most vulnerable.</p>
<p>With BaucusCare, insurance companies can breathe easy, and feel comfortable with the promise of bigger profits than they could ever have made before.  BaucusCare will require Americans to buy the products that private insurance companies offer, without providing for any mechanism that can be reasonably expected to significantly reduce the price we pay for medical insurance.  American families who are struggling to keep their homes will lose their homes because of this requirement, and the people wealthy enough to own a chunk of the insurance companies will become even more wealthy at everyone else&#8217;s expense.</p>
<p>Members of Congress like Baucus, who has taken millions of dollars from people aligned with the insurance industry, will benefit at our expense too, gaining more political power by agreeing to become servants of insurance bureaucrats.</p>
<p>If Democrats in the Senate don&#8217;t stand up to Max Baucus and push for real health care reform that actually means something, 2009 will go down in history as the Year of the Empty Promise.  BaucusCare could as easily be called <a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/baucuscareangrytoad.wmv">BogusCare.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/baucuscareangrytoad.wmv"><img src="http://www.irregulartimes.com/angrytoadbaucuscare.JPG" alt="baucuscare"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/09/16/baucuscare-video-podcast-by-an-angry-toad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Entry For the H1N1 Public Service Ad Contest</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/07/21/entry-for-the-h1n1-public-service-ad-contest/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/07/21/entry-for-the-h1n1-public-service-ad-contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Homeland Insecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h1n1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kathleen sebelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swine flu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=13314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far in the United States, as of the end of last week, 40,617 people have caught the new strain of swine flu.  Only 263 have died afterwards, and many of those people already had frail health.  That's less than a 1 percent fatality rate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Health and Human Services is treating the H1N1 swine flu very seriously &#8211; so much so that they&#8217;re giving away money to help people spread the word about the viral threat.  In a contest that ends August 17, <a href="http://flu.gov/psa/index.html">HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius</a> is asking American citizens to make video public service announcements about the H1N1 virus, and to upload them to YouTube.  A government panel will pick the best video, and the producer of that video will get $2,500 as a prize.  The result, they&#8217;re hoping, will be that a flood of videos warning people about swine flu will rush onto YouTube this summer.</p>
<p>In this economic recession, I feel reluctant to pass up a chance at $2,500, but I don&#8217;t think I can go along with the Health and Human Services campaign of fear about H1N1.  The way I see things developing, I don&#8217;t see how the fear, or the public service announcement campaign is based in a reasonable concern.</p>
<p>So far in the United States, as of the end of last week, 40,617 people have caught the new strain of swine flu.  Only 263 have died afterwards, and many of those people already had frail health.  That&#8217;s less than a 1 percent fatality rate.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ll make a <a href="Http://www.irregulartimes.com/h1n1pda.mov">public service announcement about H1N1</a>, but not the one that Kathleen Sebelius had in mind.  I think I&#8217;ll make a video on behalf of H1N1, which has gained an undeservedly nasty reputation.</p>
<p><a href="Http://www.irregulartimes.com/h1n1pda.mov"><img src="Http://www.irregulartimes.com/h1n1pda.jpg" alt="h1n1 swine flu virus public service announcement" border="0"/></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/07/21/entry-for-the-h1n1-public-service-ad-contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lobbyists and Loch Ness</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/07/lobbyists-and-loch-ness/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/07/lobbyists-and-loch-ness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loch ness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nessie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama said that there would be no lobbyists in his White House.  That doesn't mean that those lobbyists aren't actually there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, things that are supposed to be there aren&#8217;t.  Sometimes, things that aren&#8217;t supposed to be there are.</p>
<p>This warning comes from the Loch Ness monster.  Barack Obama said that there wouldn&#8217;t be lobbyists in his White House, but it now looks like what Obama said doesn&#8217;t match what he&#8217;s actually doing. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/lochnesslobbyists.mov"><img src="http://www.irregulartimes.com/lochnesslobbyists.jpg" alt="loch ness monster cartoon" border="0"/></a></p>
<p><i>(<a href="Http://www.irregulartimes.com/lochnesslobbyists.mov">Loch Ness Lobbyists mini video podcast</a>)</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/02/07/lobbyists-and-loch-ness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/lochnesslobbyists.mov" length="3652764" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the Ground Inaugural Report</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/20/on-the-ground-inaugural-report/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/20/on-the-ground-inaugural-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-20-09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demonstration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inaugural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguralprotest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oath of office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pennsylvania avenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington d.c.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A video podcast report from Jim, on Pennsylvania Avenue for Inauguration Day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Irregular man Jim is on the ground, on the street&#8230; or the avenue, anyway, and darned cold.  Here&#8217;s his morning report about what he&#8217;s seeing, and what he&#8217;s doing for the <a href="http://irregulartimes.com/dcoathofofficedemo.html">Oath of Office Inauguration Demonstration</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/inauguraldemonstration09.mov"><img src="Http://www.irregulartimes.com/inauguraldemonstration09.jpg" alt="inauguration 2009 citizen report video podcast"/></a></p>
<p><i>(<a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/inauguraldemonstration09.mov">Inauguration 2009 Video Podcast Report</a>)</i></p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/inauguraldemonstration09.wav"><i>(audio version)</i></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/20/on-the-ground-inaugural-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/inauguraldemonstration09.mov" length="17248902" type="video/quicktime" />
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/inauguraldemonstration09.wav" length="30366801" type="audio/x-wav" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moving Opposition</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/17/moving-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/17/moving-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nausea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[progressive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surreal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the champion of progress turns out to be its enemy, there's no one left on the big stage to stand for us and tell us where to go.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ground has just shifted under our feet.</p>
<p>For eight years, we have been struggling against the agenda of George W. Bush &#8211; against attacks on the Constitution such as government spying against Americans without a search warrant and electronic database dragnets, against anti-environmental shams such as the idea of &#8220;clean coal&#8221; and expanded offshore drilling, against the blending of Church and State through corrupt government kickbacks to politically active religious groups (known as &#8220;faith-based initiatives&#8221;).</p>
<p>We thought that if we were able to get rid of George W. Bush, we would get rid of these rotten programs and bring America back to its tradition of liberty and progress.</p>
<p>Now, we&#8217;re learning that the problems go far beyond George W. Bush.  These issues aren&#8217;t just problems with Bush Republicans.  They reflect a pervasive decay in American civic culture.</p>
<p>You see, with the 2009 change in the White House, we&#8217;re learning that Barack Obama supports every one of the right wing programs I just listed.  Barack Obama, in spite of his promise of change, is following many of the same policies as George W. Bush.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a disorienting thought, but the struggle against Bush&#8217;s ideas is far from over.  The struggle has just entered a new stage that, in many ways, will present more of a challenge to our idealism than anything we&#8217;ve experienced so far.</p>
<p>When the champion of progress turns out to be its enemy, there&#8217;s no one left on the big stage to stand for us and tell us where to go.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;re on our own.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/movingopposition.mov"><img src="http://www.irregulartimes.com/movingopposition.jpg" border="0"/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/movingopposition.mov"><i>(Moving Opposition Video Podcast)</i></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/17/moving-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/movingopposition.mov" length="12153424" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standing On A Beach</title>
		<link>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/14/standing-on-a-beach/</link>
		<comments>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/14/standing-on-a-beach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jclifford</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irregulartimes.com/?p=10052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One minute standing on a beach.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no commentary necessary for this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/beachstand.mov"><img src="http://www.irregulartimes.com/beachstand.jpg" alt="standing on a beach movie" border="0"/></a></p>
<p>Good night.</p>
<p>- <i><a href="http://www.irregulartimes.com/beachstand.mov">one minute standing on a beach</a></i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2009/01/14/standing-on-a-beach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.irregulartimes.com/beachstand.mov" length="3676831" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.298 seconds -->
