The Internet is all atwitter tonight about rumors that senator and Republican presidential candidate John McCain had a sexual affair with a corporate lobbyist by the name of Vicki Iseman. Most mainstream news outlets aren’t saying that. They’re playing a game of winking and nodding, with phrases like “intimate relationship” or “inappropriate relationship”. Outlets like Raw Story are describing the story in a somewhat more raw form, asking the question “Could this be the unreported political sex scandal that had the blogosphere buzzing late last year?”
Note that that question isn’t really answered. No one has proof in their hot little hands, and no one wants to be sued, so the story is all about reporters talking to political aides talking to someone’s half-sister. Blah, blah, blah.
Does it matter? Does it matter if John McCain had a sexual affair? It won’t affect my vote, and that’s not just because there’s no way in hell I’d vote for John McCain in a million years. News of a sexual affair wouldn’t affect my vote even if I would vote for John McCain in a million years (or ten thousand years, which is how long John McCain suggests we might need to be in Iraq).
Who or what a presidential candidate has sex, so long as it’s legal and consensual, has no relevance on the election.
Now, if John McCain gave this Vicki Iseman special access to government information, or gave her clients government contracts, in return for money or sex, then that is very important. It’s illegal bribery.
As far as I can tell, though, there’s no evidence of that. In fact, as far as I can tell, there’s no evidence of anything.
But then again, I don’t think that’s the point. The point is that it’s a great opportunity for somebody to make John McCain look like a big sleaze in a sexual kind of way.
Like I said, I don’t think that the private sexual matters of presidential candidates are relevant. Only bubbleheads who don’t have enough neurons to hold onto a coherent political concept care about such things. The trouble is that there are a lot of that kind of bubblehead out there in America these days.
Which brings me to Mike Huckabee.
What, am I accusing Mike Huckabee of being a bubblehead without enough neurons to hold onto a coherent political concept? Well, yes, but that’s not the point. The point is that it’s Mike Huckabee, or his supporters, who are pushing this McCain sex scandal rumor out there, in a desperate attempt to take the Republican nomination away from John McCain, after even the Republicans have largely agreed that Huckabee is too much of a wacko to trust with the presidency.
Haven’t you wondered why Mike Huckabee decided to go on campaigning even after John McCain got what appeared to be a lead in the delegate count that could not possibly be overcome, unless some terribly embarrassing scandal about McCain came out?
Isn’t it awfully convenient that this McCain lobbyist sex scandal rumor is now coming out at a time when there’s a two-week break between primary elections - enough time for sex-obssessed Republican faux-prudes to talk about nothing else?
If John McCain has to pull a Gary Hart and withdraw from the race, it won’t be Ron Paul who gets his delegates, folks.
Oh, but I don’t know for sure that’s what’s going on, of course. There is another bubblehead possibility for the source of this vapid little scandal, and this is a bubblehead with teflon hair.
That’s right, it’s one of the former, or not-so-former, Republican presidential candidates, and his name rhymes with Bitt Domney. Okay, Mitt Romney. Remember how Romney gave that mealy-mouthed speech at which he declared that he would be “suspending” his presidential campaign? That was awfully curious language, wasn’t it? At the time, people interpreted it as a sign of Mitt Romney’s denial, a refusal to admit that he, the one mighty and strong, had failed. In retrospect, one could say that it also sounded as if Mitt Romney knew something might happen that would bring him back into the race.
Will we now be seeing a Huckabee vs. Romney race to the Republican nomination? Well, shucks, I don’t know.
What I can see is this: There’s a big red curtain and three big elephant-shaped things wrestling with each other behind it. It’s getting pretty rough and tumble back there from what I can see, though I can’t really tell who is butting up against who. Will one of them slip and rip the curtains down with their tusks so that we can see what’s really happening, or will it all get smoothed over as one of the elephant shapes whispers sweet nothings like “I promise you the VP spot,” or “ambassadorships for all your illegitimate children”?
Oh let’s do keep an eye on this one - not for the sex, but for the much more tawdry soap opera of the betrayal of Republicans against Republicans.