Creationists, desperate to hold on to a literalist interpretation of the Christian Bible and deny the empirical reality of evolution, have been scrabbling lately to identify a diminishing set of missing “transitional forms” between different animal and plant classes, orders, and families. As scientists identify
In response to an article sharing news about the latest transitional fossil discovery (a four-legged snake from the ancient continent of Gondwana), creationist Paul Cawley left a comment recommending the website “Reasons to Believe” as a scientific resource regarding evolution: Great science from a REAL
The Institute for Creation Research (which, if you look carefully, describes itself as a “biblical” religious “ministry”) asks a typical anti-evolution question: Where are the transitional forms? Evolutionists sometimes brag that they have abundant evidence of transitions, but when pressed, the examples are almost always minor
Maine State Representative: Clay Proves Christian God was Right, but there’s No Scientific Evidence for Evolution
There are times when no comment is necessary. This is one of those times. Shared via screen capture to preserve the beauty for the future. Twitter is not forever: read the exchange for yourself right here, as long as it lasts.
James Delingpole’s 152nd way to Drive a Liberal Crazy: #152. Announce you’ve been boycotting Wikipedia ever since you discovered that its supposedly neutral entries have been hijacked by leftists and eco-fascists. From now on you’ll rely on the only online encyclopedia that tells it straight:
How can evolution be taught over creationism in the public schools when there are no transitional forms? We should be clear about this: If Darwin’s Theory is correct, we should be able to find a well defined trail of fossils that clearly show the gradual,
“It points to the absence of any species to species transitional forms actually found in the fossil record.” – Kirk Cameron, paleontologist, creationist, homo sapiens